KevinB:
Eric;
You are correct in that the present law prevents those who are HIV+ from coming into the USA except under special circumstances. It's an awful law and one that various groups are working to change.
Fortunately, one of the special circumstances under which people can enter the USA though HIV positive is for \"designated events.\" The Gay Games in 1994 were a \"designated event\" which is why HIV+ athletes were able to attend. GALA Chorus events have received this status, as have USA-based Olympic Games (SLC, for example), and conferences for, among other groups, the Metropolitan Community Churches.
Chicago has been working on our application for Designated Event Status ever since the result of the 2004 USA Presidential Election were known. Our team includes Members of Congress, Immigration Equality (NYC), former members of President Bush' Advisory Council on AIDS, and individuals within the FGG who helped shepherd the process in 1994. We have every confidence that we will also be granted Designated Event Status and there has been recent significantly positive movement on our application.
In the meantime, I think it's important to recognize that the Federation of Gay Games has been a worldwide leader in supporting HIV+ athletes since the early 1980s. Please keep in mind that the Gay Games founder, Dr. Tom Waddell, died of AIDS-related complications on July 11, 1987. The issue has been at the core of the FGG's mission of inclusion, participation and personal best from the very start of the movement. Specifically, the FGG has supported these goals by:
1. Establishing the DES precedent with the 1994 Gay Games in NYC, paving the way for other groups to receive the status.
2. Ongoing advocacy on immigration laws and HIV as they relate to sports.
3. Special rules that allow HIV+ athletes on otherwise banned medical therapies to compete in the Gay Games in ways that preserve their privacy.
4. Working with international sports federations on systems to allow HIV+ athletes to compete at events other than the Gay Games.
5. Worldwide attention to the issue by incorporating the Rainbow Run into officially required protocols for every Gay Games. The Rainbow Run commemorates those lost to HIV and breast cancer.
In addition to working closely on these issues with the FGG, Chicago Games, Inc., has additional ongoing efforts:
1. The creation of \"Team Plus\" to allow interested HIV+ athletes to share their Gay Games experience together if they so choose.
2. Scholarship program for HIV+ athletes (with a growing fund).
3. Close cooperation with the AIDS Foundation of Chicago and the Howard Brown Health Center to ensure that HIV + athletes in Chicago have access to medical experts, replacement medicine, and that volunteers are trained to help serve the needs of HIV+ athletes and artists.
4. Translation of Immigration/HIV information into four languages on our websites (
English Version here).
5. Specific recruitment of corporate sponsors whose support for us will include medical services, information and prescription fulfillment access. Two global sponsors in this area will be announced shortly.
In sum, the Gay Games has provided a tremendous platform upon which to build visibility around this issue. The Gay Games in Chicago in 2006 will give us yet another chance to focus the world's attention on a law that affects everyone - HIV+ or not - in the world's 3rd most populous country, the USA. Wouldn't it be great if one of the legacies of this Gay Games was further momentum to change a law that is unfair and based upon old stereotypes about disease vectors and transmission?
Kevin Boyer
Gay Games VII
Okay, I have to take a moment to slap your hand here. My apologies for making it public but I think I'm a trifle justified.
Where was this response when I've been asking about this issue FGG and Gay Games VII via e-mail for the last year plus?
It's a rhetorical question and I understand that the schism and rushing to get the infrastructure for the Games has really been a trial, so no answer is required. This is sort of like a mosquito bite, irritating but not worth spending time on.