QUOTE(aquaman @ Oct 6 2009, 08:27 PM)

I won't be at the march, nor am I big fan of HRC (I really think they're ineffectual -- the battle for gay rights is a state by state endeavor, not something to be done on a national level, IMO).
I think Obama has plenty on his plate and gay rights just isn't (and honestly, can't) be his top priority. We ALL need the economy to get better, we ALL need sensible healthcare legislation, as ALL need a change in our diplomacy. If Obama spends anytime drawing lines in the sand over gay rights issues, he can pretty much assure that anything he proposes on a number of important (vital) matters facing the country will be met with stony opposition from a lot of people in this country.

"Obama has plenty on his plate" has become such an apologist catch phrase lately. Just select any broken campaign promise or idealogy, and chalk it up to his full plate. I never thought I'd read something on a gay message board that even hinted that gay rights aren't important, nor vital, let alone coming right out and saying it. I guess they're only important when the other party doesn't deal with them.
Wow.
QUOTE(aquaman @ Oct 6 2009, 08:27 PM)

We have to accept that it will take time to overturn DADT and other government policies if we expect them to be a permanent shifts in national attitude. I truly think that (unlike during the Bush years) there are people working both within the administration and the Pentagon to build a consensus for the reversal of DADT. If Obama wrote an executive order today, he's have a lot of trouble on his hands in the Dept. of Defense, Republicans would go ape-sh*t batty, and he'd probably have to start practicing Jimmy Carter-like concession speeches.
I think what you'll see is a more meaningful movement to repeal DADT when the administration can convince enough in the Pentagon that it's time. There will be (for the first time) an open call to repeal the policy in an armed services newspaper editorial. Did any of us think that would happen in Bush's years? Clinton's? Not.
Do any of us think we'll be getting it any time soon with this administration? Not. (Yeah, 1991 called...it wants its slang back) . And for once I'd like to hear an argument made for Obama without GWB and Sara Palin being mentioned. Everyone knows they're idiots, and that they have nothing to do with Obama not getting things done.
But again, the excuses are more
liberally (pun intended) applied. It's amazing how we
have to give this administration more time.
QUOTE
Part of what makes me like Obama is that he's the opposite of what his accusers think of him: he's no firebrand. He's not overly forward leaning. He's seen the mistakes others have made and he's quite conservative in his temperment. He will do the right thing, but it's going to take some time to get there all the way.
Yes, he's not "overly forward leaning"...in other words, he doesn't try
that hard. So let's give him a Nobel Peace Prize and more time while Iraq and Afghanistan keep brewing, while the economy still sucks, and gay rights still don't seem to get anywhere. I mean, seriously, cut the poor guy some slack.