http://www.thismodernworld.com/
>>
More on Eli Lilly
The conservative argument in favor of the special Eli Lilly Payback Provision of the Homeland Security bill is essentially this: there's no scientific evidence linking the vaccine preservative thimerosal to autism--only anecdotal (which is true). The eeeevil trial lawyers, however, will use this anecdotal evidence to bankrupt, I tell you, bankrupt the pharmaceutical industry, and then when the terrorists unleash smallpox or some other biological agent upon us, we'll have no vaccines with which to protect ourselves, because the pharmaceutical companies will have all closed up shop and gone home.
Of course, this imaginative justification still doesn't explain why the provision was added to the bill at the last minute under cover of darkness, nor why Trent Lott had to promise to "revisit" the issue because even moderate Republicans blanched at passing the bill with this provision intact.
Nor does it address some other interesting points Bob Herbert brought up yesterday:
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/25/opinion/25HERB.html
Now this has nothing to do with homeland security. Nothing. This is not a provision that will in any way protect us from the ferocious evil of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda. So why is it there? Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that the major drug companies have become a gigantic collective cash machine for politicians, and that the vast majority of that cash goes to Republicans.
Or maybe it's related to the fact that Mitch Daniels, the White House budget director, is a former Eli Lilly big shot. Or the very convenient fact that just last June President Bush appointed Eli Lilly's chairman, president and C.E.O., Sidney Taurel, to a coveted seat on the president's Homeland Security Advisory Council.
There's a real bad smell here. Eli Lilly will benefit greatly as both class-action and individual lawsuits are derailed. But there are no fingerprints in sight. No one will own up to a legislative deed that is both cynical and shameful.
And then there's this extraordinary tidbit:
WASHINGTON (Reuters Health) - Attorneys for the Bush Administration asked a federal court on Monday to order that documents on hundreds of cases of autism allegedly caused by childhood vaccines be kept from the public.
Department of Justice lawyers asked a special master in the US Court of Federal Claims to seal the documents, arguing that allowing their automatic disclosure would take away the right of federal agencies to decide when and how the material should be released.
Attorneys for the families of hundreds of autistic children charged that the government was trying to keep the information out of civil courts, where juries might be convinced to award large judgments against vaccine manufacturers.
Nope, nothing funny going on here. The Republicans are only motivated by a desire to protect the homeland, pure and simple.
(For more on this topic, check out PLA and Wampum.)
http://pla.blogspot.com/
http://wampum.blogspot.com/
<<
http://wampum.blogspot.com/ says:
>>
Another possible lobbyist for the provision not mentioned by the Post is none other than Lilly CEO Syndey Taurel, tapped for a much coveted seat on the President's Homeland Security Advisory Council. And the Budget Director's door appears to be a revolving one for Lilly, as Bush Sr. appointee Deborah Steelman was hired by Lilly to replace Mr. Daniels as VP of Corporate Affairs.
Of course, the idea couldn't have come from the President himself, even though his father, G.H.W., joined Lilly's Board of Directors after leaving the CIA in 1977 (Bush was given the position by Dan Quayle’s father, who owned controlling interest in the Indiana company.) And Poppy has never been known to act improperly on behalf of Lilly...well, except that time while Vice President when he was ordered by the Supreme Court to stop lobbying the IRS on behalf of Lilly and other pharmaceuticals.
<<
[ December 02, 2002: Message edited by: twin58 ]