Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Policy Coming to an End?
Outsports Discussion Board > Outsports > Politics & Religion
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
bobby78751
QUOTE
gamecock:
Interesting story in this week's Washington Blade (see link to story below) detailing a gay military service member (who they refer to as \"Private Ryan\" in order to protect his identity), who while on a six-month deployment to Iraq and Kuwait came out to his military peers and stated that \"acknowledging he is gay had no adverse impact upon unit cohesion or morale\"....moreover, the story goes on to describe how \"Ryan\" has formed a secret gay group, \"the Gay & Lesbian Service Members for Equality, a group of 15 anonymous, actively serving members of the United States armed forces who seek to lift the gay ban\"....also of interest was the quotes from Jeff Cleghorn, a retired Army major who is urging more gay veterans to speak out in defense of gay soldiers and disparagingly of \"Don't Ask, Don't Tell\" since, in his words, \"there are over one million gay veterans and we, unlike current gay soldiers, can safely talk.\"

Anonymous Soldiers Launch Gay Military Group
This is freakin' awesome and dispells the right-wing/moderate Democratic myth that coming out will cause a cohesive military unit to fall apart. Good for "Private Ryan" and the "Anonymous 15"...and kudos to his officers for doing absolutely nothing to prosecute him as a violator of Don't Ask/Don't Tell.
gamecock
QUOTE
bobby78751
This is freakin' awesome and dispells the right-wing/moderate Democratic myth that coming out will cause a cohesive military unit to fall apart. Good for \"Private Ryan\" and the \"Anonymous 15\"...and kudos to his officers for doing absolutely nothing to prosecute him as a violator of Don't Ask/Don't Tell.
Excellent points, Bobby....the one thing to clarify, though, as the article points out is that "Ryan", who states he hopes to have a long career in the military, "has NOT told his superiors about his sexual orientation, noting that it was important for him not to tell anyone who could 'take action' against him"....while this is certainly understandable it is nevertheless great to see him describe how well his peers who know about his sexual orientation have accepted him....hopefully this is another "small" step in the long journey that will enable our gay men (and women) in the armed forces to serve openly and proudly in the very near future -- as Wesley Clark and Howard Dean, among others, continue to support.
bobby78751
QUOTE
gamecock:
QUOTE
bobby78751
This is freakin' awesome and dispells the right-wing/moderate Democratic myth that coming out will cause a cohesive military unit to fall apart. Good for \"Private Ryan\" and the \"Anonymous 15\"...and kudos to his officers for doing absolutely nothing to prosecute him as a violator of Don't Ask/Don't Tell.
Excellent points, Bobby....the one thing to clarify, though, as the article points out is that \"Ryan\", who states he hopes to have a long career in the military, \"has NOT told his superiors about his sexual orientation, noting that it was important for him not to tell anyone who could 'take action' against him\"....while this is certainly understandable it is nevertheless great to see him describe how well his peers who know about his sexual orientation have accepted him....hopefully this is another \"small\" step in the long journey that will enable our gay men (and women) in the armed forces to serve openly and proudly in the very near future -- as Wesley Clark and Howard Dean, among others, continue to support.
Oops, my bad...I meant to say his fellow soldiers, not the officers. Thanks for the correction.

[ November 04, 2003, 08:53 AM: Message edited by: bobby78751 ]
araanib
Not to put "Private Ryan" in any danger here, but I know him quite well, and if his command doesn't know that he is gay, then they -- as W&G's Karen says so aptly -- have no head. He's a brilliant guy, very articulate, and also very obvious. I'm sure that aspect was left out of the article to protect him, but it actually goes to strengthen his argument. If everyone knows you're gya and nobody cares, then why the hell is the regulation still there.

Hey, kid, if you're reading ... ana ahibuka katheerin!
CPT_Doom
This only adds to the wealth of data, from the US and our allies, that having openly gay service members does not affect unit cohesion. I am amazed at Private Ryan's courage (although it seems it may be necessary courage - if he's that obvious), but also concerned for his future. Given what happened to Barry Winchell, it seems that letting too many people know you are gay is a real risk in the military, to more than just one's career.

I also think it would be great for gay veterans to be far more open about their status - it would hammer home the point that the military literally could not function without gay and lesbian service people. Living in DC, it is an open joke in the gay community how gay the local military really is. I have had some surreal moments, like having bruch with a 20-year active Navy gay couple (been together for most of their careers), when John Ashcroft walked in the same restaurant, or when I learned a waiter at Hamburger Mary's was leaving to follow his Marine doctor boyfriend to Camp LeJeun.

It would also be helpful for those service members who are still homophobic and refuse to acknowledge the large number of gay service members who are present in the military. I have a good friend (Air Force Major) who is like this, and is appalled at any suggestion there are gay people in the military - he regards it as an affront to the military system - which I find very sad.
sportinlife
Clark is wavering again. On CNN's Rock The Vote he says he would send the policy back to the brass for review. No word on what he would do if they decided they wanted to keep the status quo. I trust Clark's sense of fairness but I'm not sure what half-measure he might except in lieu of outright equal treatment for gay soldiers.
twin58
Gratuitous link that quotes Barry Goldwater:

QUOTE
In 1993, Barry Goldwater, the father of the modern conservative movement, testified before the Senate in favor of allowing gays to serve openly in the services. \"You don't have to be straight to shoot straight,\" declared the old soldier, who knew a thing or two about shooting straight.
Actually, he had been in the Air Force, but that's another story.

Google for {"barry goldwater" dadt} to find other links.
fenwayguy
Meanwhile, in Annapolis, a group of 31 Naval Academy graduates shed their anonymity and applied to establish a GLBT graduates association to be called USNA Out.

From the Ball'mur Sun:

QUOTE
\"While it's politically impossible for the military to acknowledge the presence of openly gay active duty personnel, recognition of a veterans group would be an important half-step along the way toward integration and away from discrimination.\"
QUOTE
\"USNA Out is critically important so that we demonstrate that we are proud and visible and have nothing to hide. I think all of us had a common experience at the Naval Academy that we want to prevent others from having to go through.\"
As a Navy brat whose family was stationed in Annapolis for a couple of years, and who has great respect for the Academy, I say awesome!
gamecock
QUOTE
redsoxbreath:
Meanwhile, in Annapolis, a group of 31 Naval Academy graduates shed their anonymity and applied to establish a GLBT graduates association to be called USNA Out.
From the Ball'mur Sun
As a Navy brat whose family was stationed in Annapolis for a couple of years, and who has great respect for the Academy, I say awesome!
Awesome is definitely an accurate description, RSB!....huge kudos to these 31 USNA grads whose actions will hopefully prove to be a BIG step toward eliminating the horrendous DADT policy once and for all....although a decision from the Naval Academy Alumni Association will probably not be forthcoming until next year, it was good to see the Baltimore Sun reporter acknowledge that, despite likely opposition from a "large number of conservative graduates", the alumni association will be faced with "rejecting what appears to be a by-the-book request by bona fide alumni to form a chapter" , even going so far as to confirm "there is at least one precedent for a national chapter based on interest (as opposed to geography): one for recreational vehicle enthusiasts".

In light of the fact that the USNA has long advocated discriminatory policies against gays and lesbians, I find the comments of the academy spokesman to be highly hypocritical when he stated "a midshipman's sexual orientation is considered a personal and private matter" ....nevertheless, I certainly hope that these men and women who have already let their names and voices be heard in support of "USNA Out" are successful in their efforts and when they are, I'm sure the leaders in Annapolis will be shocked to see the LARGE number of gay alumni that "come out of the woodwork" and join....it will be interesting to see how this turns out, to say the least.

[ November 12, 2003, 05:59 PM: Message edited by: gamecock ]
twin58
The all-important Service Academy Gay and Lesbian Alumni website.
fenwayguy
They Didn't Ask. He Didn't Tell.
CBS News 60 Minutes, Sunday November 17, 7pm ET/PT

The long and distinguished career of U.S. Army Lt. Col. Steve Loomis ended in 1997 after it was discovered he was gay. Loomis didn't violate regulations by declaring his sexual orientation. It was accidentally revealed when his house was set afire by an arsonist, and a sexually explicit videotape in which he appeared with other men was found in the search for evidence.

Loomis was discharged just eight days before he reached 20 years of active duty, a milestone that would have entitled him immediately to a pension. Instead, he will receive a smaller reserve pension when he turns 60.

He is suing the federal government, contending that the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy and its sodomy statute are unconstitutional based on people's right to privacy. "It's my private issue, my private life. It was none of the Army's damn business."

The former Judge Advocate General of the Navy, retired Adm. John Hutson, tells Morley Safer it is time to allow gay people to serve openly in the U.S. military. Hutson is the highest ranking person in military circles to publicly call for an end to the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays.

"You can be openly gay right now and serve with the FBI, the DEA, Secret Service. You can serve in the police departments and the fire departments of major cities...in the military of Great Britain, Israel, Australia, Canada, France, Germany," says Hutson. "We've matured as a society... We can change and, if you can change, then I think we have the moral imperative that we must change."

[ November 15, 2003, 08:15 PM: Message edited by: redsoxbreath ]
fenwayguy
Sex, lies, videotape and DADT, on 6o Minutes tonight
boomer400
Gen. Clark on Gays: Axe 'Don't Ask', Give Civil Unions

Democratic presidential hopeful Wesley Cark says if he were in the White House he would order the military to implement a policy allowing gays to serve in the military, and then press to have Congress approve it.

...

Responding to a number of questions asked by the Human Rights Campaign of all the Democratic Candidates, and released today, Clark said, " I would ask the military to craft and implement a policy that ensures that everyone who wants to serve their country is permitted to do so with honor and dignity. I would ask the military to look seriously at the British policy, which prohibits sexual misconduct by both heterosexuals and homosexuals. I would then submit the new policy to Congress to replace the current ‘Don't Ask, Don't Tell’ law.”

In terms of relationship recognition all ten candidates said they support granting gay and lesbian couples federal domestic partner benefits.  "Same-sex couples deserve the same federal benefits, rights, privileges, and responsibilities as opposite-sex couples," said Clark.


Now if only he can get his campaign together...


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Discussion of General Wesley Clark continues in the thread Wesley Clark is in!! - Outsports moderator

[ December 09, 2003, 02:29 PM: Message edited by: m1 ]
fenwayguy
SLDN on Lt. Col. Loomis. Good show.
HulaBoy
Regarding the Lt. Col. Steve Loomis piece on 60 Minutes, what I heard is that this 40-something officer had a tryst with a 19-year-old recruit, and took some racy pictures of the kid. So it doesn't sound to me like he's such a squeaky clean poster child after all for ending the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy.

While the boy was technically of age, and apparently not directly under the command of Col. Loomis, does anyone disagree that this is, at best, a case of really bad judgment? And I would say exactly the same thing about a straight relationship between an officer & enlisted person.

I'm not suggesting Loomis was treated fairly -- being denied his pension just 8 days before retirement -- but like most other minorities, we are held to a higher standard in the public eye, rightly or wrongly.
hockeyTom
I also saw the story on "60 Minutes". And I too, would have to agree that there was some bad judgement involved regarding the pictures and I guess a pornographic movie the two made as well. But, as I understand it the Fire Dept. of the local area are the ones would took posession of the tape, viewed it, then decided to get the military involved. It was his private property. And the Fire Dept. should have done the right thing and return the tape to Loomis, instead of turning it over to the military. The man obviously earned every medal he got, and I hope he wins his lawsuit to regain his full pension.
fenwayguy
QUOTE
redsoxbreath:
31 Naval Academy graduates shed their anonymity and applied to establish a GLBT graduates association to be called USNA Out.
Unfortunately, Academy alumni reject gay group.

A telling comment by the "spokesman for the alumni association": "The group just did not fit the profile of our alumni chapters." In other words, they don't fit in. D'oh...

[ December 06, 2003, 09:59 AM: Message edited by: redsoxbreath ]
Jim Allen
One of the subtexts in service members coming out after the leave/are kicked out is their benefits. What are the protections in place to protect their pensions if they come out later? Are there any?
araanib
Once you are out (and I mean OUT-out, not just inactive reserve), they won't take your benefits.

[ December 06, 2003, 05:26 AM: Message edited by: araanib ]
m1
In another thread, jqueer posted

Naval Academy nixes gay alumni chapter

How many people have seen this article?

The one question I have is if there are Christian or Jewish or African-American alumni organizations. If there aren't the Academy is in a strong position.


RGMike replied

nice interview with the guy in today's SF Chronicle (he lives here):

Go Navy!

However, if he's got a website and already has 43 interested guys, why does he need the Navy? Yes, it would be nice for them to sanction it, but...


twin58 replied

USNA Alumni Association website
fenwayguy
QUOTE
jqueer:
The one question I have is if there are Christian or Jewish or African-American alumni organizations.
No, they're just geographical, plus one "on the road" chapter.

I appreciate the positive spin that Steve Clark Hall put on the rejection, as quoted By PlanetOut, "Although some may be disappointed, we have to consider that for the first time ever there was significant discussion about LGBT alumni at the Alumni Association. That is a decade or two of progress in just one month."

Also amused by an apparent typo in the SF Chronicle piece, "the Annapolis school's alumni association board voted anonymously to reject his nascent chapter's application." According to the other stories, I believe that was "unanimously"... or maybe it was both! biggrin.gif
fantomas
Fascinating NY Times article! Some former high-ranking officers are coming out, saying publicly that "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" just isn't working.

NY Times: Gay Ex-Officers Say 'Don't Ask' Doesn't Work

QUOTE
WASHINGTON, Dec. 9 — Three retired military officers, two generals and an admiral who have been among the most senior uniformed officers to criticize the "don't ask, don't tell" policy for homosexuals in the military, disclosed on Tuesday that they are gay.

The three, Brig. Gen. Keith H. Kerr and Brig. Gen. Virgil A. Richard, both of the Army, and Rear Adm. Alan M. Steinman of the Coast Guard, said the policy had been ineffective and undermined the military's core values: truth, honor, dignity, respect and integrity.
Advertisement

They said they had been forced to lie to their friends, family and colleagues to serve their country. In doing so, they said, they had to evade and deceive others about a natural part of their identity.

The officers said that they were the first generals and admiral to come out publicly and that they hoped that others would follow.

They are the highest-ranking military officers to acknowledge that they are gay. Col. Margarethe Cammermeyer was discharged from the Washington State National Guard in 1992 for being a lesbian. She was later reinstated.
sportinlife
QUOTE
fantomas:
Fascinating NY Times article! Some former high-ranking officers are coming out, saying publicly that "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" just isn't working. NY Times: Gay Ex-Officers Say 'Don't Ask' Doesn't Work
Inspiring story and a long overdue occurence. Hopefully gay athletes will take note of the fact that they came out in unison; basically as a team.
CPT_Doom
Thanks for the link fantomas - a great story. However I do have a problem with one statement:

QUOTE
And while gay service members are believed to make up only a small fraction of a military of more than one million men and women, commanders have said they are concerned that forcing heterosexual members to live, and fight, side by side with gays will undermine the military's mission to win the nation's wars.
Depending on what you mean by "a small fraction" this could be WAY off base. I think part of the issue with DADT is that many in the military realize gays, and particularly, lesbians are in the military in proportions much greater than their presence in general society, and that is why they are concerned about unit cohesion. Certainly gays and lesbians are not a majority in any branch, but I'd be surprised if at least 20% of the military isn't gay. If the homophobic military members realized how many of their fellow servicemen and women were gay, they'd flip.
araanib
Depending on what branch and what MOS you are, the proportion can be very high. Medical corps, intel ... I've seen platoons with a higher percentage than 20% openly identify themselves as gay. My partner lived in a barracks where 9 out of the 16 people on his hall were gay men.
Jim Allen
Follow this link for the SLDN press release and pictures of the 3 men.

The homophobes won't be able to dismiss this as easily as if it was the lowest private making these statements; these guys were pretty high up in the chain of command.
twin58
The Plight of Gays in the Military (3 Letters)

QUOTE
To the Editor:

As a former Army officer who is lesbian, I am heartened by the courageous act of coming out by Brig. Gen. Keith H. Kerr, Brig. Gen. Virgil A. Richard and Rear Adm. Alan M. Steinman, who criticized the policy of "don't ask, don't tell" ("Gay Ex-Officers Say `Don't Ask' Doesn't Work," news article, Dec. 10).

Compelling people to lie about who they are is perhaps the most pernicious and deleterious aspect of the policy for the individual soldier whose service is predicated upon duty and honor. "Don't ask, don't tell" rests on the faulty foundation that to know that someone is gay is so reprehensible that it would disrupt unit cohesion.

While those of us who are gay took the same oath as heterosexual Americans to uphold the Constitution, in doing so we sacrificed our hearts, our family life and the intimacy that all human beings yearn for. I decided it was too high a price to pay for my country and left the service, after 16 years, despite an exemplary record.

Ultimately, the country sacrifices the gifts and talents of its gay and lesbian citizens to sustain this deeply flawed and un-American policy.

TANYA L. DOMI

Bronx, Dec. 10, 2003



To the Editor:

In "Gay Ex-Officers Say `Don't Ask' Doesn't Work" (news article, Dec. 10), you noted that three retired military officers — two generals and an admiral, who have been among the most senior uniformed officers to criticize the "don't ask, don't tell" policy — disclosed that they are gay.

Your article proves your headline wrong. The policy does work. How else could they have had successful military careers? In fact, they had it even rougher than current gays do since, unless they did not know they were gay when they joined the military, they had to lie to join, as the "don't ask" policy has only been around 10 years.

WAYNE L. JOHNSON

Alexandria, Va., Dec. 10, 2003

The writer is a retired commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps.



To the Editor:

Gays already serve and fight in the American military (news article, Dec. 10). It is time to change the "don't ask, don't tell" policy to "don't ask, don't care."

AMY JO MARASH BOWERS

Montclair, N.J., Dec. 10, 2003
fenwayguy
From Newsweek this week, \"Coming Out - After 10 years of don’t-ask-don’t-tell, the tide may be turning in favor of allowing openly gay soldiers to serve in the military."
NoLongerHere
Twin and Jim Allen - THANKS for the links!!!
fenwayguy
More good news: List Of Ex-Military Brass Denouncing 'Don't Ask' Grows To 15

Way to keep up the momentum, ladies and gentlemen! "Americans long ago desegregated our military. Our courts, local governments and corporations have affirmed that gays are an integral and valued part of the American family. Our military too should lead in defense of liberty and freedom for all."


Here's SLDN's press release.
sportinlife
It is very encouraging news that non-gay ex-military personnel are supporting the movement to change the policy. The greatest barrier to changing laws that hurt gays is the perception that supporting doing so will cause that person to be perceived as gay - a problem that the movements for civil rights for blacks and women did not face.
fantomas
QUOTE
sportinlife:
It is very encouraging news that non-gay ex-military personnel are supporting the movement to change the policy. The greatest barrier to changing laws that hurt gays is the perception that supporting doing so will cause that person to be perceived as gay - a problem that the movements for civil rights for blacks and women did not face.
No, but non-black supporters of civil rights for blacks were sometimes ostracizeddd, firebombed, or, as in the case of Schwerner and Goodman, killed outright.

These non-gay supporters are doing the right thing. It takes courage, but I take my hat off to ALL all of the military members (currently enlisted, honorably or dishonorably discharged, and former enlistees or draftees) who've come out, and those who aren't gay who've shown support for ending the discrimination.
araanib
OK, so I don't have a link here, but the Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military (CSSMM) -- at which yours truly is a research bitch -- just sent out a press release last week showing the results of a CNN/USA Today/Gallop poll asking the question "Do you think people who are openly gay or homosexual should - or should not- be allowed to serve in the U.S. military?"

The Results:

Yes, should: 79% (797 respondants)
No, should not: 18% (179 respondants)
Don't know: 3% (29 respondants)

In the 18-29 age range, 91% said yes.

Forgive me a momentary "booyah."

BOOYAH!
gamecock
Booyah is right aaranib!....I don't know what affect, if any, these results will have upon the views of our political "leaders" but if the results of the poll accurately reflect the sentiment of the American people (albeit in a very small sample) it can't do anything but help our cause.

Now let's hope some of these bigoted, "old school" politicians come to their senses and realize that if they don't start voting for equality and basic human rights their chances of being re-elected will be greatly diminished.
twin58
QUOTE
redsoxbreath:
Meanwhile, in Annapolis, a group of 31 Naval Academy graduates shed their anonymity and applied to establish a GLBT graduates association to be called USNA Out.

Ball'mur Sun
The story was back in the news today. For some reason, it ended up on the first page of the Washington Post Metro section, rather than in the front section.

Gay Navy Grads Start New Chapter

QUOTE
Gay Alumni Open a New Chapter
Annapolis Graduates Want Academy to Recognize Calif. Group

By Christian Davenport
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, November 28, 2004; Page C01

He guarded the secret throughout his four years at the U.S. Naval Academy, and for a few years after that as an officer. Jeff Petrie knew that if his self-described "double life" were exposed, his military career would be over.

Then, on a stop in Oman during the Persian Gulf War, Petrie boarded his ship and saw a piece of paper with familiar handwriting.

It was a steamy love letter from his boyfriend back in the States. Someone had opened it and placed it on the quarterdeck for everyone to read.
....

Since leaving the Navy without incident in 1993, Petrie, 37, has gone from hiding his sexuality to petitioning the academy's alumni association for formal recognition of a San Francisco-based chapter for gay men and lesbians that he has founded. The association's Board of Trustees is scheduled to take up the petition at a meeting Thursday.
....

Last year, the board rejected Petrie's group, then called USNA Out, saying it served only a small group of alumni and therefore was exclusionary. The board also said that alumni chapters must have a geographic base from which to draw members.

"The process is consistent," said Skid Heyworth, a spokesman for the alumni association. Although the association was not discriminating against the group, he said, it "has never before chartered a special-interest chapter, and it did not want to begin that practice."

This year, the group changed its name to the Castro Chapter, named for the Castro District, a heavily gay neighborhood in San Francisco. Petrie said the chapter is open to everyone regardless of sexual orientation. Two of its 68 members are straight.
....


<small>[ November 28, 2004, 02:45 PM: Message edited by: twin58 ]</small>
sportinlife
This Navy Times article doesn't require registration.

The outcome of this one could be interesting. More interesting might be how the policy for current enlistees will be affected, if at all.

Overall it is probably a good thing that the gay group is open to all, but the geographical requirement seems specious at best. What's next?
fenwayguy
Denied, again.
QUOTE
The Alumni Association executive leadership points to increasing participation in Alumni affairs by openly gay graduates as evidence that the current structure is working.

(Naval Academy Alumni Association President and CEO George P. Watt Jr) adds that the Alumni Association welcomes and encourages the members of the proposed Castro District Chapter to join and support their local Association chapter and continue to act as advocates for the Naval Academy, the Alumni Association and the naval service in the community in which they live and serve. He visited San Francisco last summer and delivered a message of inclusiveness to the Academy’s Alumni there.

Chet Kolley, president of the San Francisco Chapter, confirms that the group has several gay members and that about one-third of the chapter’s officers are openly gay. “None of them has mentioned to me that they feel unwelcome here, and I certainly have seen no evidence of it at any of the many chapter events that I have attended,” says Kolley. “The chapter would not benefit from the loss of some of its members to a new splinter group,” Kolley adds.
I'd be more likely to believe him if he had visited the Tulsa chapter to tout gay members' achievements and the association's inclusiveness.
twin58
From alt.obituaries and many other sources. I wanted to add this to the This is an Outrage!! thread. I have since learned that it was renamed Seven gay linguists dismissed under DADT, but I had already posted this message here.

QUOTE
THEODORE SARBIN; Studied Role of Gay Troops

The New York Times
September 7, 2005 Wednesday

Theodore Sarbin, 94, Scholar; Studied Role of Gay Troops

BYLINE: By MARGALIT FOX

Theodore R. Sarbin, a prominent social psychologist who in 1988 helped write a controversial Pentagon report recommending that the United States military end discrimination against gay men and lesbians, died on Aug. 31 at his home in Carmel, Calif. He was 94.
....

Dr. Sarbin's report was prepared for the Defense Personnel Security Research and Education Center, at the time a Navy program. Completed in late 1988, the report was publicly rejected by the Pentagon after it was leaked to the news media the next year by members of Congress sympathetic to the cause of gay men and lesbians in the military. The report was written with Kenneth E. Karols, a Navy psychiatrist and surgeon.
....

Theodore Roy Sarbin was born in Cleveland on May 8, 1911. As a young man, he rode the rails as a hobo, an experience he would later say helped him identify with people on the margins of society.
....

Dr. Sarbin's report was originally commissioned to examine the security risks posed by gay men and lesbians in the military. In the finished report, ''Nonconforming Sexual Orientations and Military Suitability,'' he and Dr. Karols concluded that gay men and lesbians posed no greater risk than heterosexuals did. They recommended that the Pentagon rethink its policy barring them from service.
....

His report for the military was published in book form in 1990 as ''Gays in Uniform: The Pentagon's Secret Reports'' (Alyson Publications), edited by Kate Dyer.
....
FeverDog
Will Phelps be picketing his funeral too? rolleyes.gif
UCLAfan
Now, doesn't this story beat all? Former General John Shalikashvili has finally come out in opposition to the same military policy he once supported, the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.

Progress is something that doesn't occur very often and yet this story both enraged and heartened me. It enraged me that we still deal with the discrimination that is still tacitly endorsed across America. However, it also heartened me that even a former general who spoke out against gays now embraces the concept of an open military, that sexual orientation isn't such a big deal as others would make it to be.

Progress. Yes, it does come with pain and struggle and conflict. But once it is made, that same pain turns to knowledge and understanding and eases the conflict and struggle in time. All we need do is look at how racism in America was once endorsed in legal doctrine of "separate but equal". Yet we look back at those times and think, how could that ridiculous notion have existed? Perhaps America will one day look back on these days of open discrimination against us and say the same thing. I, for one, look forward to that day and am hopeful that day will arrive.
swiminbuff
Saw this on CNN yesterday. Wolf Blitzer discussed it with former Defence Secretary Bill Cohen who seemed to think it needed more study and discussion but wasn't a top priority. Some woman, probably from a right wing Christian group, commented that a "foxhole was no place for dating" which seemed like an incredibly assinine statement.
Surely the US realizes that if its service men are serving in Iraq & Afghanistan with any of their allies that they are probably serving along side some gay soldiers since the UK as well as many other NATO nations allow GLBT service people. The UK in fact is actively recruiting in the gay community and obviusly do not feel that it has a negative impact on moral.
NoLongerHere
Reporters shouted at commercial break that Don't Ask Don't Tell is being repealed (???)...

These were the most recent news stories I could find:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070301/ap_on_...sk_don_t_tell_6

and even more promising:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20...13750-3284r.htm

Watched the news (missing the opening of The Daily Show, grrrrr) and they showed a bit of Marine Corps Sgt. Eric Alva's testimony. The newscaster said Democrats felt confident the legislation would pass.
UCLAfan
While this legislation is probably D.O.A., it is a significant step forward. Progress is oftentimes made in small steps toward the goal, not one giant leap all at once. Yes, I am very heartened by this news.
twin58
Your talk is destroying America.
jaragonus
This it the time to get rid of this idiotic rule!
NoLongerHere
The Colbert Report did a fantastic riff on "don't ask don't tell" tonight.
Excellent and clever stuff. Look for it online, or catch it tomorrow...

Update from today:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070307/us_nm/...itary_gays_dc_1
fenwayguy
Colbert: Don't Know, Don't Think laugh.gif "The Iraqis will greet us as Liberace."
NoLongerHere
As if on cue, the AP reports a top general "calls homosexuality immoral":
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070313/ap_on_...e/military_gays
Mahaney
I think it would be interesting if all the gays in the armed forces could just walk out ( if there were no repercussions for them).
Falconpride
QUOTE(Ou Sooner 1997 @ Mar 13 2007, 08:45 AM) *

I think it would be interesting if all the gays in the armed forces could just walk out ( if there were no repercussions for them).


I don't know if people would have the internal fortitude to do that, but it would make quite a statement. It would certainly bring a lot of media attention, which wouldn't be a horrible thing.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.