Got this e-mail from my nephew yesterday:
QUOTE
although I'm using my mother's e-mail account for this correspondence, this is actually from Brew. My final project for my English class happens to be a project on family history. I was hoping that you could provide me with family tree information for at least three generations. I'm a little interested in more than that, but I'm not required to have anymore. I will be in good standing if I only have that far back on one side, and I thought it would be easier to ask it from someone who has already researched. I also need a collage, so if you have any extra copies of pictures, they would be useful. Of course, I am already in good standing there, so it's more up to how much you're willing to attribute. It would also be extremely helpful if you could compile and send whatever you will before Monday, as I will need to be completed soon.
I thought his grammar was atrocious and I would have taken the time to reply with a "corrected" version but it was obvious that he has limited time with mid-terms coming up, so I simply responded with the information he requested. I would also like him to write back later and will continue writing him as long as he is interested.
I am deliberately self-conscious about my grammar when I write to my nephews and nieces. It detracts sometimes from the amount, and perhaps quality, of the content but it hopefully sets something of an example, even if I'm a chemist and not a grammarian.
He is a very bright kid by the way (slipping into proud uncle mode here) who was the only representative from his high school at the state chess competition when he was younger. I'm not sure how old he is now (I think about 14 though he's about 6' 3" and built like a linebacker) but his mother only allows him and his siblings to use the computer from home, and under supervision.
He's very good at math and science but has a lot of work to do if he wants to be an effective writer. I've noticed in my career that it is rare for people gifted in science and math to also be literary. The days of the Thomas Jefferson's and Leonardo Da Vinci's went out with the invention of mass communication and the ballooning of the amount of information in the world. Specialization requires that large chunks of knowledge be ignored. It may not be necessary but it is the path many choose for practical reasons.
Bill Cosby is right. But Bill Cosby's grammar is not stellar either. I love the guy, always have, always will. But I think his emphasis should be on continuing to exploit the talents that already abound in quantity in the African-American community, as he has done so well in the past. With any luck my nephew will be a much better scientist than I am one day, and his kid a better one than him.
Who knows? Some day he may be the ancestor of another Da Vinci - or several. It will happen - one day at a time, one generation at a time.
[ May 28, 2004, 02:08 PM: Message edited by: sportinlife ]