Well, now these turns of events are interesting, because both the Tennessee and Virginia moves can be considered completely unConstitutional, under the 14th Amendment, the Full Faith and Credit clause, and the whole non-interferance with Interstate Commerce.
Think about it - I am part of a company with a business trip to Rhea County, Tennessee - by barring me because I am gay, the locality will be interfering with Interstate Commerce, which is unConstitutional (and I'm sure if my interpretation is wrong, MIB will let me know). And if these neanderthals make my very existance a crime (as opposed to a specific act I may or may not engage in), doesn't that violate some rules in the Constitution - after all, I cannot stop being who I am, and can never not commit the crime they claim.
As for Virginia, I found this part of the Equality Virginia piece very interesting:
QUOTE
The effects could include:
Revoking hospital visitation rights, or medical directives. These could be interpreted as a \"partnership contract,\" which this bill expressly prohibits;
Rendering inoperative, agreements entered into by gay couples with children giving the non-biological parent the legal authority to make medical and education-related decisions for their minor children;
Prohibiting any existing health insurance coverage for gay and lesbian employees and their loved ones. This could be seen as a \"benefit of marriage\";
Finding invalid out of state same-sex second parent adoptions or custody decisions.
Unlike marriage contracts, at least some of these items have already been ruled on by federal courts. Certainly states have to abide by other states' adoption decisions (there was a case from Mississippi last year where a lesbian couple in VT was denied an amended birth certificate for a child born in MS but adopted in VT, but the courts ruled in the women's favor).
Certainly medical powers of attorney or custody agreements must also fall under the category of contracts that all states must abide by. I'd love to see VA try to enforce this one.
More importantly, although BG does not want to move - could you at least boycott VA merchants. In fact, I would love to see the DC gay community rise up if this law is passed to refuse - maybe for one day, or one weekend, or one week, to do any shopping in N. VA - and to get straight allies to do the same. Since N. VA is more liberal than the rest of the backwater, they might actually miss the $$.