This story is actually a couple of months old, but I just heard about it on the news last week and then found this Web article:
http://governing.com/articles/10gays.htm
This prompted me to look and see if Cincinnati was singled out in the 'Worst gay city' thread on the Non-Sports forum, but surprisingly it wasn't mentioned at all. I knew the city has had its share of racial problems, but wasn't aware that it is especially homophobic. Perhaps someone who lives in Cincinnati or at least has been there (I haven't, myself) would like to comment. Anyway, kudos to Proctor & Gamble for its progressive action.
The article is quite long, so in case the link doesn't work, or for those who don't want to sift through the whole thing, I've copied the most relevant paragraphs below:
"There is a growing sense among Cincinnati's business leaders that the city's reputation for hostility toward gays and lesbians is taking an economic toll on the region and its ability to attract a top-quality workforce. Article 12, they say, is symptomatic of a mindset that turns away not only talented gay workers but also legions of creative straight people who are the key to growing jobs and wealth in the global economy.
And even more surprising, much of the momentum within business ranks is coming from the Cincinnati corporation with perhaps the stodgiest historical reputation: Procter & Gamble. P&G thinks Cincinnati must become more gay-friendly if it wants to reverse its steady decline in population. Internally, the company has changed policies so that the domestic partners of gay employees get the same benefits package as the spouses of married workers. Now P&G wants Cincinnati to take the next step and repeal Article 12."