QUOTE
Oh! The hypocrisy!
Oh! The tedium! Get a new tune, you're the
Free Bird and
Stairway to Heaven of this board.
As usual, the MIB apples-and-orange approach at work. Drudge tries to do a Monica/Clenis Pt. 2, the only people that really ran with it were Murdoch-owned outlets, it backfires on him because it wasn't true--he couldn't even get a basic fact right, the woman was a reporter, not an intern--and that's that. Even the wingnuts at Free Republic and the other righty blogs know it was a non-story.
Whereas Flynt says he has proof. From Atrios' site (I can't do a direct link, he doesn't have permalinks):
QUOTE
...just a reminder. Flynt previously floated this story on Crossfire back in '00, and the CNN producers flipped out, started screaming in his ear, and the transcript was removed permanently from their website. Here's what he said:
[ROBERT] NOVAK: Mr. Flynt, never let it be said that we censor any of our guests here on CROSSFIRE, and you said you wanted to talk about the election. Tell me what you wanted to say.
FLYNT: Well, during the impeachment debacle, we did an investigation which resulted in the resignation of Bob Livingston and others and we have continued this investigation and for eight months we've been looking into George W. Bush's background. And we've found out in the early 1970s he was involved in an abortion in Texas, and I just think that it's sad that the mainstream media, who's aware of this story, won't ask him that question when they were able to ask him the drug question without any proof at all, and we've got all kinds of proof on this issue.
NOVAK: Well, you're...
FLYNT: You know, the guy admitted he was a drunk for 20 years, and if the abortion issue is true then that puts him lower on the morality scale than Bill Clinton.
NOVAK: Mr. Flynt, you said if it's true and you have no proof of that. I gather you are a very strong...
FLYNT: The hell we don't have proof.
NOVAK: Sir, I gather you're a very strong Gore supporter. Is that correct?
FLYNT: I'll vote for the lesser of the two evils. I don't like either one of them.
[BILL] PRESS: All Right, Larry Flynt, a man who speaks his word, but we remind you they are Larry Flynt's words and not ours. Larry Flynt, thank you very, very much for joining us.
This was followed by an online chat, in which Flynt went into greater detail:
CNN - Mr. Flynt, I would like to know how you plan to protect yourself from a law suit by claiming to have the goods on GWBush.
Flynt: Because we have them and the truth is an absolute defense.
CNN; When and where are you going to publish information about George W. Bush?
Flynt: When I said that we had the proof, I am referring to knowing who the girl was, knowing who the doctor was that pereformed the abortion, evidence from girlfriends of hers at the time, who knew about the romance and the subsequent abortion. The young lady does not want to go public, and without her willingness, we don't feel that we're on solid enough legal ground to go with the story, because should she say it never happened, then we've got a potential libel suit. But we know we have enough evidence that we believe completely. One of the things that interested us was that this abortion took place before Roe Vs. Wade in 1970, which made it a crime at the time. I'd just like the national media to ask him if abortion is okay for him and his family, but not for the rest of America. We're not looking at it as a big issue, we're looking at it as a situation of people not being told the truth. I think the American people have a right to know everything there is to know about someone running for President.
The name of the woman involved, the Bush operatives involved, the dates, the hospital etc. all that are known. Flynt
knows he has to have an airtight case before going public. And hm....Ashcroft just announced another anti-porn drive. Coincidence?
If this really is true, it's probably the end of the Bush junta. Shrub doesn't win this year, Jeb is dead in the water and well, Neil's too busy getting herpes from Asian hookers to be a factor in any case. Or are The Twins going to run for office? And if it's true, Bush is also liable for murder charges (as is the woman, which might be why she would be hesitant to come forward). Well, apart from the charges he'll hopefully face at the War Crimes Tribunal at The Hague.
[ February 17, 2004, 07:43 PM: Message edited by: Jim Allen ]