What do the rest of you think? Why couldn't they have gotten real journalists to do this? There are many who openly champion the White House and its politics.
NY Times: US Videos, for TV news, come under scrutiny
QUOTE
WASHINGTON, March 14 — Federal investigators are scrutinizing television segments in which the Bush administration paid people to pose as journalists praising the benefits of the new Medicare law, which would be offered to help elderly Americans with the costs of their prescription medicines.
Advertisement
The videos are intended for use in local television news programs. Several include pictures of President Bush receiving a standing ovation from a crowd cheering as he signed the Medicare law on Dec. 8.
The materials were produced by the Department of Health and Human Services, which called them video news releases, but the source is not identified. Two videos end with the voice of a woman who says, \"In Washington, I'm Karen Ryan reporting.\"
But the production company, Home Front Communications, said it had hired her to read a script prepared by the government.
Another video, intended for Hispanic audiences, shows a Bush administration official being interviewed in Spanish by a man who identifies himself as a reporter named Alberto Garcia.
Another segment shows a pharmacist talking to an elderly customer. The pharmacist says the new law \"helps you better afford your medications,\" and the customer says, \"It sounds like a good idea.\" Indeed, the pharmacist says, \"A very good idea.\"
The government also prepared scripts that can be used by news anchors introducing what the administration describes as a made-for-television \"story package.\"
In one script, the administration suggests that anchors use this language: \"In December, President Bush signed into law the first-ever prescription drug benefit for people with Medicare. Since then, there have been a lot of questions about how the law will help older Americans and people with disabilities. Reporter Karen Ryan helps sort through the details.\"
The \"reporter\" then explains the benefits of the new law.
Lawyers from the General Accounting Office, an investigative arm of Congress, discovered the materials last month when they were looking into the use of federal money to pay for certain fliers and advertisements that publicize the Medicare law.
In a report to Congress last week, the lawyers said those fliers and advertisements were legal, despite \"notable omissions and other weaknesses.\" Administration officials said the television news segments were also a legal, effective way to educate beneficiaries.
Gary L. Kepplinger, deputy general counsel of the accounting office, said, \"We are actively considering some follow-up work related to the materials we received from the Department of Health and Human Services.\"
One question is whether the government might mislead viewers by concealing the source of the Medicare videos, which have been broadcast by stations in Oklahoma, Louisiana and other states.
Federal law prohibits the use of federal money for \"publicity or propaganda purposes\" not authorized by Congress. In the past, the General Accounting Office has found that federal agencies violated this restriction when they disseminated editorials and newspaper articles written by the government or its contractors without identifying the source.
***
Bill Kovach, chairman of the Committee of Concerned Journalists, expressed disbelief that any television stations would present the Medicare videos as real news segments, considering the current debate about the merits of the new law.
\"Those to me are just the next thing to fraud,\" Mr. Kovach said. \"It's running a paid advertisement in the heart of a news program.\"
Advertisement
The videos are intended for use in local television news programs. Several include pictures of President Bush receiving a standing ovation from a crowd cheering as he signed the Medicare law on Dec. 8.
The materials were produced by the Department of Health and Human Services, which called them video news releases, but the source is not identified. Two videos end with the voice of a woman who says, \"In Washington, I'm Karen Ryan reporting.\"
But the production company, Home Front Communications, said it had hired her to read a script prepared by the government.
Another video, intended for Hispanic audiences, shows a Bush administration official being interviewed in Spanish by a man who identifies himself as a reporter named Alberto Garcia.
Another segment shows a pharmacist talking to an elderly customer. The pharmacist says the new law \"helps you better afford your medications,\" and the customer says, \"It sounds like a good idea.\" Indeed, the pharmacist says, \"A very good idea.\"
The government also prepared scripts that can be used by news anchors introducing what the administration describes as a made-for-television \"story package.\"
In one script, the administration suggests that anchors use this language: \"In December, President Bush signed into law the first-ever prescription drug benefit for people with Medicare. Since then, there have been a lot of questions about how the law will help older Americans and people with disabilities. Reporter Karen Ryan helps sort through the details.\"
The \"reporter\" then explains the benefits of the new law.
Lawyers from the General Accounting Office, an investigative arm of Congress, discovered the materials last month when they were looking into the use of federal money to pay for certain fliers and advertisements that publicize the Medicare law.
In a report to Congress last week, the lawyers said those fliers and advertisements were legal, despite \"notable omissions and other weaknesses.\" Administration officials said the television news segments were also a legal, effective way to educate beneficiaries.
Gary L. Kepplinger, deputy general counsel of the accounting office, said, \"We are actively considering some follow-up work related to the materials we received from the Department of Health and Human Services.\"
One question is whether the government might mislead viewers by concealing the source of the Medicare videos, which have been broadcast by stations in Oklahoma, Louisiana and other states.
Federal law prohibits the use of federal money for \"publicity or propaganda purposes\" not authorized by Congress. In the past, the General Accounting Office has found that federal agencies violated this restriction when they disseminated editorials and newspaper articles written by the government or its contractors without identifying the source.
***
Bill Kovach, chairman of the Committee of Concerned Journalists, expressed disbelief that any television stations would present the Medicare videos as real news segments, considering the current debate about the merits of the new law.
\"Those to me are just the next thing to fraud,\" Mr. Kovach said. \"It's running a paid advertisement in the heart of a news program.\"
[ March 14, 2004, 10:26 PM: Message edited by: fantomas ]