Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: WMD lies may roil Australia too
Outsports Discussion Board > Outsports > Politics & Religion
fantomas
Guardian's Dave Fickling: Spinning out of control

QUOTE
The revelation came with the resignation of Andrew Wilkie, a senior analyst at Australia's top intelligence body, the Office of National Assessment (ONA). A former soldier with an open, affable manner, Wilkie used to sit in his Canberra office reading raw intelligence reports from Australian and international spy agencies, weighing them up and then boiling them down into briefings for the prime minister and cabinet.
His military background meant he was given a particularly wide-ranging role in the run-up to the Iraq war, though the government has done its best to downplay his importance among ONA's staff of 30.

Wilkie does not mince his words. Claims of collaboration between Saddam Hussein's regime and Al Qaeda were \"preposterous\". \"They were clearly concocted. There was no strong intelligence to support it whatsoever,\" he says.

Evidence about that missing stockpile of weapons of mass destruction was similarly unreliable. \"It was clear before the war that some of the evidence on WMD coming out of Britain and America was garbage,\" he says. \"It was being skewed by political information from Iraqis who were trying to encourage a US invasion.\"

Only half-jokingly, he talks about sitting at his desk and rapidly directing Pentagon-originated intelligence reports to the ONA rubbish bin.


[ June 16, 2003, 10:29 PM: Message edited by: fantomas ]
sportinlife
Leave to the Aussies to blurt out the truth.
Bob Dog
Not the least bit surprising.

Anyone who has read from traitorous (read: not pro-US
invasion) news sources knows the whole invasion was
imperialism. If any country was being "old Europe",
it was the US.

Weeks before the invasion, Newsweek (about as mainstream
as any US media - "Periscope" is a well-known mouthpiece
for the CIA) published an item on "WMD". Shrub and the
US *knew* that Hussein destroyed all illegal weapons in
1991 when the UN inspectors were there but failed to
tell this publicly in the propaganda build-up.

Whether Hussein acquired new weapons after 1991 is
another matter, and that is exactly the point - it *is*
another matter, not the original US accusation. The US
invasion was based a claim of Hussein never destroying
weapons in 1991.

And, of course, no mention of the fact that the US was
the country who sold Hussein the weapons between 1980
and 1990. (Don't forget who were the US presidents then,
or that Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney were part of
the administrations and who personally sold weapons to
Hussein.)


Bob Dog
Kona Guy
The honesty of the Aussies is refreshing. Hopefully the majority of Americans will wake up and realize what a sham the pre-emptive strike based on Iraq having WMD was.
p2insdca
I am some what ashamed of how we look in the eyes of the world....A friend of mine from the UK told me that the feeling there about this admin, AND the American people can be sumed up as follows..
Q)Did you hear that American is changing its national anthem?
It will now be BAA BAA Black sheep
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.