Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Mariani vs. Bush et al: 911 Widow Files RICO Act Suit
Outsports Discussion Board > Outsports > Politics & Religion
twin58
Lawsuit text file

Once at that site, you can download the suit as a .pdf file as well.

QUOTE
....

STATEMENT OF THE CASE
....

10. As widely reported and confirmed by many American independent researchers of the facts and circumstances of \"911,\" Defendant GWB knew the attacks of \"911\" were probable and failed to act. Specifically, Special Agent Robert Wright wrote a memo on June 9, 2001, warning his superiors, Defendant DOJ/FBI of the potential of terrorists hijacking aircraft to attack the United States and two (2) months later, Defendant GWB's National Security Advisor, Defendant Condoleezza Rice, acknowledged that on August 6, 2001, (one month prior to the \"911\" attacks), she provided a written brief to Defendant GWB at his Texas ranch which warned \"OBL\" might try to hijack U.S. aircraft. Plaintiff, as all Americans have a \"right to know\" why these reports provided Defendant GWB were not acted upon to prevent the most deadly attacks against our nation since Pearl Harbor which led us into War World II as \"911\" is now leading us into the never ending \"IWOT.\" From the mountain of evidence and the ongoing \"secrecy\" of Defendant GWB and his unwillingness to cooperate with the \"911 Commission,\" Plaintiff brings this RICO Act civil action to obtain justice for herself and husband Louis Neil Mariani and to expose the \"truth\" to the American public as to the great betrayal Defendants have inflicted upon each and every freedom-loving American arising from the crimes prior to, during and after \"911.\" [13]
....

SUMMARY OF FACTS [18]
....

32. That, on or about 9:05 a.m. Andrew Card walks up to Defendant GWB in front of the world while Defendant GWB is listening to a goat story and is alleged to have whispered in his ear; \"A second plane has hit the World Trade Center . America is under attack.\" For approximately the next seven (7) to eighteen (18) minutes Defendant GWB continues to listen to the goat story while Plaintiff's husband was just murdered and does not immediately assume his duties as Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces.
....

Count VI
....

73. Plaintiff asserts and will produce at trial, bona fide evidence showing Defendants have engaged in a long \"pattern of criminal activity\" and on-going pattern of \"criminal obstruction of justice\" constituting continual, long-term criminal modus operandi that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, and victims and the threat of continuing activity, interrelated by distinguishing characteristics. Plaintiff believes the attacks of \"911\" that resulted in the murder of her husband and the magnitude of the crisis is readily apparent by noting that \"911\" serves as a pretext for a never-ending war against the world, including preemptive strikes against defenseless, but resource rich countries. It also serves as a pretext for draconian measures of repression at home, including the cabinet level Department of Homeland Security and Patriot Act I and its sequel and once the truth is exposed in this matter, the primary beneficiaries of \"failing to act and prevent\" the \"911\" attacks on America include Defendant GWB, his family, \"political supporters\" and Defendant friends who have made hundreds of millions off the \"IWOT\" as of this date.
....

81. Plaintiff believes it is noteworthy to close this RICO Act Count with the observations of Canadian social philosopher John McMurtry:

\"To begin with, the forensic principle of 'who most benefits from the crime?' clearly points in the direction of the Bush administration. . .The more you review the connections and the sweeping lapse of security across so many coordinates, the more the lines point backwards [to the White House].\"
....
Press release

Another site for viewing the lawsuit

Big tip o' the hat to Alex Jones for the link.

[ December 03, 2003, 08:56 PM: Message edited by: twin58 ]
MIB
Conspiracy theorists--not to mention the lawyers--are going to LOVE this.
fantomas
Ah yes, conspiracy theorists...but wasn't W and Co. stalling on giving REPUBLICAN head of the 9/11 investigation committee Tom Kean White House briefings and other records? WHY would he be doing this if he and Count Dracucheney had nothing to hide? In fact, why is he always hiding everything and then LYING about it?
Jim Allen
Oh Fantomas, you're SO naive. It's all about Dean and his Vermont records. Get with it!

smile.gif smile.gif
SCTrojan
Obviously this hasn't been discussed for a while, but here's an interesting article/interview in the LA Times magazine about dissenting voices who question who was really behind 9/11. Like all controversial topics this will probably be an ongoing interesting topic & discussion for decades, if not centuries, to come. Read on:

http://www.latimes.com/features/printediti...dlines-magazine

[ August 29, 2005, 09:47 AM: Message edited by: SCTrojan ]
MIB
Just out of curiosity, did anyone watch the 2-part special on the National Geographic Channel last Sunday and Monday? It was called "Inside 9/11." I thought it was excellent. It was nonpolitical, nonideological, just a presentation of what led up to the attacks and how they went down, including some stunning footage never before shown on television.
twin58
As cable is against my religion, I didn't see that. Actually, I was housesitting for a few days last week at a place with DirectTV. 200 channels, but all I did was surf right through them.

I didn't think there was any footage of 911 that I hadn't seen. The most dramatic I've seen so far was that shot by the French team that just happened to be out with the firefighters; they caught the first plane running right into the north tower.

It's still hard to watch. I have none of it on tape, and I don't want any on tape.
blueraider
QUOTE
SCTrojan:
Obviously this hasn't been discussed for a while, but here's an interesting article/interview in the LA Times magazine about dissenting voices who question who was really behind 9/11.  Like all controversial topics this will probably be an ongoing interesting topic & discussion for decades, if not centuries, to come.  Read on:

http://www.latimes.com/features/printediti...dlines-magazine
All very interesting whether it has a shred of accuracy or otherwise. I suspect that 40 years from now, people will be discussing theories about this like they do about the JFK assasination today.
SCTrojan
Originally posted by MIB:

Just out of curiosity, did anyone watch the 2-part special on the National Geographic Channel last Sunday and Monday? It was called "Inside 9/11." I thought it was excellent. It was nonpolitical, nonideological, just a presentation of what led up to the attacks and how they went down...

No I didn't see it, but I agree w/ twin58 it's too hard to watch some of that footage now. I felt overwhelmed w/ so much footage & pain when it happened. Everyone I had contact w/ (whether friends, peers, or family members) had the issue of 9/11 on their lips. Now when I read or watch something about 9/11 I like to see/read something new that would bring an interesting twist to learn. However, I do love the National Geographic Channel so maybe I'll look out for it. I'm sure I would enjoy it.

BTW, I do like the fact that you mentioned that it is nonpolitical & nonideological. I'm beginning to become more & more disenchanted w/ many (if not most) politicians & idealogues.

[ August 29, 2005, 08:31 AM: Message edited by: SCTrojan ]
RazorbackTX
QUOTE
MIB:
Conspiracy theorists--not to mention the lawyers--are going to LOVE this.
As usual, no interest in facts whatsoever.

"Bin Laden determined to attack inside the United States" Aug 6 2001

Bush: Lets go fishin'!!!!
MIB
Considering that bin Laden's attacks were planned during the Clinton Administration, why didn't he stop bin Laden? Gone fishin' with Monica, I presume.
MIB
QUOTE
twin58:
As cable is against my religion, I didn't see that. Actually, I was housesitting for a few days last week at a place with DirectTV. 200 channels, but all I did was surf right through them.
That's why God invented TIVO, twin. smile.gif

QUOTE

I didn't think there was any footage of 911 that I hadn't seen. The most dramatic I've seen so far was that shot by the French team that just happened to be out with the firefighters; they caught the first plane running right into the north tower.

It's still hard to watch. I have none of it on tape, and I don't want any on tape.
There was some footage of the second plane hitting, and this footage was from a viewpoint that was never before shown. I had to rewind it several times because I admit it was stunning. The angle was as if it was shot from someone in the Tower who was watching the plane heading straight toward him. Weird.
MIB
QUOTE
RazorbackTX:
 
QUOTE
MIB:
Conspiracy theorists--not to mention the lawyers--are going to LOVE this.
As usual, no interest in facts whatsoever.

\"Bin Laden determined to attack inside the United States\" Aug 6 2001

Bush: Lets go fishin'!!!!
Gee, Raze. Took you almost two years to respond to that post. What's a matter? Your paranoia slow down your thought processes? Wouldn't doubt it.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.