Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: 21,000 Draftees in Iraq
Outsports Discussion Board > Outsports > Politics & Religion
DownLowNY
I know there are those who will attempt to quibble about the definition of draftee, but having one's tour of duty unilaterally extended amounts to involuntary servitude. This is especially true for those in the Reserves and the National Guard. A draft by any other name is a draft just the same.


Army Extends Tours Despite 1-Year Pledge

By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer

WASHINGTON - About 21,000 American soldiers in Iraq who were to return this month to their home bases in Louisiana and Germany will have their tours extended at least three months to help combat the surge in anti-occupation violence, defense officials said Wednesday.

The decision, which has not been announced publicly, breaks the Army's promise to soldiers and their families that assignments in Iraq would be limited to 12 months. The affected soldiers already have been in Iraq for a year.

In addition, about 1,000 soldiers in transportation units based in Kuwait will be extended beyond one year, a senior defense official said. Most of them are in the National Guard or Reserve. They are deemed critical to re-supplying the troops based in Iraq.

Welcome-home ceremonies at Fort Polk, La., scheduled for this month, have been canceled. In Baumholder, Germany, some soldiers' families have stopped marking the days off the calendar.

The top U.S. commander for the Middle East, Gen. John Abizaid, decided that the increase in violence was so threatening that he needed to have the extra firepower, officials say.

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld was fine-tuning the new plan Wednesday; his spokesmen declined to discuss details. They said it was possible that Rumsfeld would make it public on Thursday.

The tour extensions come at a particularly delicate moment. At least 87 troops have been killed in April, the deadliest month since they set foot in Iraq in March 2003. The number of wounded also has skyrocketed.

Of the estimated 21,000 soldiers affected by the extension in Iraq, about 18,000 are in the 1st Armored Division. About 2,800 are with the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment.

The advantage of keeping soldiers of the 1st Armored and the 2nd Armored Cavalry in Iraq for an extra three months — rather than bringing in an equivalent number from elsewhere — is that these soldiers have unmatched combat experience in Iraq.

The Army is so stretched by its commitments in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Balkans, and elsewhere that it has few, if any, forces immediately available to substitute in Iraq for the 1st Armored or 2nd Armored Cavalry.

Also, these units have been heavily involved in one of the most important U.S. military missions there: training thousands of Iraqi security forces. Those Iraqi army and civil defense corps members are central to the Pentagon's plan for eventually turning over military control to the Iraqis and pulling out U.S. troops.

Abizaid had planned, as part of the current rotation of fresh forces into Iraq, to reduce the U.S. troop presence from about 135,000 to about 115,000.

But the surge this month in anti-occupation violence in restive areas in and around Baghdad and in the south has forced Abizaid to change course. He indicated on Tuesday that he needed more forces than originally planned. He would not tell reporters exactly how many or where he would get them.

Fort Polk, the Army base in Louisiana that is home to the 2nd Armored Cavalry, issued a news release last Thursday quoting the regiment's commander, Col. Bradley W. May, as saying "elements" of his unit "will remain in theater longer than initially announced."
He did not say how many soldiers were affected. A senior defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Wednesday it would be about 2,800.

The 2nd Squadron of the 2nd Armored Cavalry recently returned home to Louisiana, but the rest of the unit will remain in Iraq. May did not say how much longer his unit would remain in Iraq. Other defense officials said family members were told the soldiers probably would be back at Fort Polk in about four months. They likely will be in Iraq an extra three months, then take a month to redeploy.

These are not the first units to be extended in Iraq beyond one year. A brigade of the 82nd Airborne was extended by about three months.

Rumsfeld has said he would grant any request that Abizaid made to adjust the level of his combat power. President Bush said at a news conference Tuesday night that he was ready to provide as many extra troops as U.S. commanders on the ground say they need.

The 1st Armored and the 2nd Armored Cavalry are part of a contingent of about 135,000 U.S. soldiers who were being replaced this spring by a fresh group of soldiers and Marines. The 101st Airborne, the 4th Infantry Division and other units recently left Iraq, with the arrival of the 1st Infantry Division, a Stryker Brigade, the 1st Cavalry Division and the 1st Marine Division.
DallasUNC
If you voluntarily joined the armed forces that doesnt amount to you being drafted. I dont want to see those people die in Iraq either or stay longer than they need to, but they joined the armed forces to be in the armed forces. They were not forced. If you dont want to be a soldier, you dont sign up.

My brother spent a year and a half there and invaded Bagdhad. He got to go home but now he has to go back in December. Is that fair either? No, but its military life in a time of war.

[ April 14, 2004, 09:13 PM: Message edited by: DallasUNC ]
azairforce
good post Dallas, I agree and I'm very much against the war in Iraq and the President. All your points are very valid. You that might be part of the job when you sign up. I pray for all the soldiders every day and hope they are home soon.
sportinlife
The Defense department is supposed to defend the nation. Ideally that's why anyone would sign up for service.

Whether or not the invasion of Iraq is a valid "defense of the homeland" is a question every individual has to make.

Joining the service doesn't strip you of the right to make that judgement and act accordingly. Refusing to make a decision is one.
azairforce
your right sport, i really enjoy your posts, they always make you think and would really enjoy to have a conversation with you sometime.

we do have a choice and I voice my opinion at work everyday about my feelings on our president and the war in iraq. Im very proud to be in the military and ive really enjoyed it and would join again if i had to do it all over.

i respect everyone that stands up and says they arent going and I think the longer this lasts the more people will do it.
DownLowNY
The following news story simply confirms what anybody with any sense in their head long knew--the US occupation force in Iraq is too small to properly garrison the country. Bush is going to have to call up a lot more troops if he hopes to really stabilize the situation in time for the June 30th "transfer of sovereignty."


Army Analyst Calls Bush Iraq War Strategy Flawed

By David Morgan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration went to war in Iraq with a flawed strategy that sought victory "on the cheap" and is now paying the price in the form of a growing insurgency and doubts about its goal of building a democracy, a top U.S. Army analyst says in a recent report.

Lt. Col. Antulio Echevarria, director of national security affairs at the Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute, said Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other administration officials rejected as "old think" early calls for more troops from senior commanders.

The Strategic Studies Institute said the report, posted on the War College Web site www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/index.html, contained the opinions of the author and not necessarily those of the Army, the Defense Department or the federal government.

On Thursday, Rumsfeld expressed surprise at the growing U.S. death toll in Iraq while announcing that 20,000 troops would have their tour of duty extended.

The United States has 137,000 troops in Iraq, and had planned to reduce the count to about 110,000 in May before fighting surged.

On the eve of war, Rumsfeld heaped scorn on then-Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric Shinseki who warned Congress that several hundred thousand U.S. troops might be needed to stabilize post-war Iraq.

Some analysts have suggested that maintaining peace in Iraq, a country with a population of 25 million, would require as many as 500,000 soldiers.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.