Sorry to interupt the war with domestic news but here goes.....
http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?...%7D&siteid=mktw


Must be time for a war or tax cut!

[quote]Originally posted by RazorbackTX:
Sorry to interupt the war with domestic news but here goes.....
http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7B2C7D2E38%2DFC62 %2D4F88%2D95B7%2DC0F3EF024E05%7D&siteid=mktw://http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/sto...%7D&siteid=mktw://http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/sto...%7D&siteid=mktw


Must be time for a war or tax cut!

---

Actually, Raze, here's a story that makes me question this whole war thing:

Bush Just Says No to Tax Cuts

[ September 20, 2002: Message edited by: William1865 ]

How exactly does a story about the President recognizing that the government's revenue is not meeting expenses cause one to "question this whole war thing"?

If someone were pessimistic about the current administration's ability to manage the economy effectively, they might argue that a war with Iraq provides a cover for reversing a policy that was misguided to begin with. "We can't reduce taxes because the war on terror costs money" is a simple thing to explain to people...

By all means question...... After the minimal time spent on war,[ our intiative still hasn't been clearified] Our econmomy will tail spin after recent economic catasrophies.

[quote]Originally posted by MetsBoy:
How exactly does a story about the President recognizing that the government's revenue is not meeting expenses cause one to "question this whole war thing"?

If someone were pessimistic about the current administration's ability to manage the economy effectively, they might argue that a war with Iraq provides a cover for reversing a policy that was misguided to begin with. "We can't reduce taxes because the war on terror costs money" is a simple thing to explain to people...

---

I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. I was being sarcastic. Next time I'll put 50,000 smiley faces after it so it's all clear to everyone.

For f**k's sake W1865. We can't see you, we can't hear you giggling with glee like a 14-year old girl at an *NSYNC concert as you lob another stink bomb at the Left and you seem to only post to make wild, outrageous statements about Democrats/liberals. I don't take you seriously, but really, would it hurt to use just ONE smiley face to let people know? Not everyone here has the *cough* pleasure *cough* of knowing your house style.

[quote]Originally posted by Jim Allen:
For f**k's sake W1865. We can't see you, we can't hear you giggling with glee like a 14-year old girl at an *NSYNC concert as you lob another stink bomb at the Left and you seem to only post to make wild, outrageous statements about Democrats/liberals. I don't take you seriously, but really, would it hurt to use just ONE smiley face to let people know? Not everyone here has the *cough* pleasure *cough* of knowing your house style.

---

Okay, maybe I was being unreasonable there. It was early. Sorry guys.