Where is Condi when he needed her?

Yahoo Photo link

I have no idea why anyone would even look below the guy's belt. Although he is not an unattractive man -- he has zero sex appeal as far as I'm concerned.

bobby, let's just thank God it was not Cheney with his fly open. YIKES!! Remember this board thread?

Cheney's Balls

What does it matter whether his fly is open or not. From what ya'll have said, he's a pussy anyway, so there's nothing to see.

:-)

I'd like to see it! I venture to say there are a few people in this group who could work on it and get a rise out of him. He's not unattractive,it's his policies that make him loathsome.

Do you have some kind of unnatural primate fetish? :confused:

I DO find President Bush a handsome man and smile back at his happy smiling face every time I go to and from the federal courthouse. I don't find ALL of his policies as attractive, his threatened laxity on illegal immigration troubles me, as does his support for FMA, but overall "handsome is as handsome does!"

Let's not make fun of our recently elected Dumbya.

He can't articulate a clear thought without a script, he can't ride a bike without falling off, he can't even remember to zip his pants, but he can launch disastrous wars and push hateful legislation with the best of 'em!

[ November 26, 2004, 10:32 PM: Message edited by: fantomas ]

While in college, I worked at a convalescent hospital. In the employee washroom was a sign that read: PLEASE WASH YOUR HANDS AND ZIP UP YOUR PANTS BEFORE LEAVING ROOM Maybe the White House should put a similar sign in every bathroom.

~Adam

Thanks for the information I'll remember all that when he is getting sworn in for his second term in January.

And in the women's room, this will be written on the mirror: "CONDI, GEORGE IS MY HUSBAND, NOT YOURS. --LAURA"

Please do--I mean, you're a homosexual, aren't you, so FMA--and the anti-gay marriage referendum that passed in Ohio--does concern you!

you forgot to mention race fan.. try again.

At least no one here has ever forgotten to zip his fly.

Can someone else please post all of the other photos of former presidents with their fly open in public at an international conference. Thank you! Case closed, judge!

I repeat (because sometimes it doesn't get through thick skulls:

At least no one here has ever forgotten to zip his fly.

You guys are really getting desparate. What's next--"Bush wears a sock that had a hole in it"? How about, "Bush's tie goes below the bottom of his belt--fashion experts up in arms"? Or maybe, "Bush precedes his wife up the escalator--etiquette experts in shock"?

Sieg Heil!

I AM upset about the passing of the STUPID anti-gay marriage referendum :mad: (even though I would be fine with civil unions, personally) But I AM sad for my friends here in Ohio, even though I don't intend on ever marrying. :cool: But even if Kerry had won, it would not have changed the Ohio referendum. They are 2 seperate issues like apples & oranges.

[ November 28, 2004, 05:31 PM: Message edited by: copman ]

They're NOT separate issues, Copman. Surely you can see that. The referenda were put on ballots by right-wing groups across across the country, IN COORDINATION WITH THE NATIONAL GOP, in an effort to turn out right-wing, anti-gay voters this November! In fact, one of the main people pushing these referenda is a closeted homo who knew exactly what he was doing. And it worked.

Whether you plan to marry or not, there are many who like not to have their right to do so legally declared DOA just because they happen to be of the same sex. Hell, if Rush Limbaugh can dump wives like diet pills and Scott Peterson has the right to remarry after slaying his pregnant wife, shouldn't homosexuals be allowed this basic opportunity?

[QUOTE]Originally posted by fantomas:
They're NOT separate issues, Copman. Surely you can see that. The referenda were put on ballots by right-wing groups across across the country, IN COORDINATION WITH THE NATIONAL GOP, in an effort to turn out right-wing, anti-gay voters this November! [/QUOTE ............ Possibly - but you are giving the Repubs a lot of credit for organization skills. I'm not sure they are as organized as you suppose. After all it was Kerry forces who seemed to be able to bring all the Dems together like they haven't been in years. They dumped EVERY other candidate including front runner Dean right away. Now THAT's organization!
I think with the organization that Kerry had he would have won if he would have been more pro- Kerry ( putting forth HIS Iraq plan for example) & less anti-Bush. But I guess hindsight is 20/20 right?

[ November 29, 2004, 04:03 PM: Message edited by: copman ]

Three different statements here, of which only the first is verifiably true. The second is for the most part speculative, and the third draws an incorrect conclusion from President Bush's reelection as much as it conflates FT's two bogeymen into one "vast right-wing conspiracy."

You'll never satisfy him, Copman, even by agreeing with him. That's one of the main reasons why his candidate lost the election and the one with the greater appeal to reason won.

Greater appeal to reason? I don't think so.

Ignoring gmg (who loves to talk about reason yet makes a statement claiming that reason of ANY sort could be found within a 50 degree radius of W, and who goes on about working from the "inside" as the GOP shifts further and further to the far right...), I DO give the GOP tons of credit, Copman. I think they ran superb campaigns at the national and local levels, and on the state level, for example, GOP backers and funders coordinated beautifully with people like the Swiftees. This isn't "speculation," it's documented. And it worked.

Don't forget that the GOP did a similar Kerryesque move in 2000 by pushing out a superior candidate, John McCain, partly through smears, to line up behind W. I can tell you, as a liberal, that I very likely would have supported a McCain re-election (since I think he would have defeated Gore handily), unless he were running against a truly progressive Democrat. I cannot imagine that we'd be in the mess we're in today, with the economy, with Iraq, etc., if McCain had been elected president. And he is a Republican through and through. I feel the same way about Colin Powell--that is, before he pimped himself with that UN debacle.

I also agree that had the Democrats been more pro-Kerry, they might have won a few more votes, but they were facing the juggernaut of this ill-conceived and executed war AND the aftermath of 9/11 AND the anti-gay agenda AND one of the most brilliant political machines we've seen in years. So I think they might have come closer, but until they can figure out a way to retain a few of the states they'd been winning (Iowa, New Mexico), and gain a few new ones, they'll be the minority party. Perhaps some of the Democratic governors in a few of the red-leaning states might be able to bring the Democrats back.

All of that said, the national GOP set the stage with the Party platform for the amendments in the states, particularly swing states; there was active coordination between GOP state activists, the anti-gay referenda leaders, and national GOP politicians; and the GOP did benefit by putting the anti-gay marriage referenda on the ballot in a number of the swing states. It didn't work in Oregon, for example, but what might the vote have been for W among some of the right-wing evangelicals if that motivator hadn't been in place? Rove made a point, just days after W was re-elected, of stressing that W was going to push for FMA--the national/federal version. Aren't there 1,000 other pressing concerns facing this nation beyond FMA?

and that person is...?

[ November 30, 2004, 12:58 PM: Message edited by: RGMike ]

[quote]fantomas:
[/quote]I can tell you, as a liberal, that I very likely would have supported a McCain re-election
[/QB][/QUOTE]
Yep- I voted for him in the primary in 2000. I'd vote for him any day. 2008--GO MCCAIN!!!

Ken Mehlman. Recently annointed head of RNC. Chair of Bush's presidential campaign. Former Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Political Affairs, working directly under Karl Rove, in which he oversaw all aspects of W's political agenda by working with the GOP in Congress, federal agencies, state parties, and community and political action groups.

And let's not forget Mr. Bareback-Sex-Is-Best himself Dan Gurley, who isn't closeted. He ran the RNC's highly successful field campaigns across the country.

As Doris Duke, like thousands of others, once said, "What goes around comes around, and payback is a bi...."