Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Agenda for 6/28 S.F. Nader meeting
Outsports Discussion Board > Outsports > Politics & Religion
MPetrelis
http://www.mpetrelis.blogspot.com/

Dear Friends:

As you probably know by now, the Green Party on Saturday chose David Cobb to be its presidential candidate this year.

While I am certainly disappointed the Greens didn't endorse Ralph Nader and Peter Camejo, I will waste no time bemoaning this development, and still support the party and its slate of candidates. There is no way I could do otherwise when I am trying to give California voters choices at the ballot box, other than Democrats and Republicans.

With the Green Party endorsing Cobb over Nader/Camejo, our efforts to get them on the California ballot must increase, and fast.

The agenda for our June 28 meeting has been updated.

1. Introductions
2. Review of current signature gathering (How many signatures from SF/Bay Area do we have?)
3. Review of voter registration effort
4. Update on Nader/Camejo merchandise
5. Promotion of votenader.org web site
6. Future plans: signature gathering at "Fahrenheit 9/11" screenings and Rainbow Grocery, our next meeting, Nader's appearance in S.F. on July 16.


Please come to the June 28 meeting at City Blend Cafe (see below for more info about the time and address).

Best,
Michael Petrelis
415-621-6267
^^^

Forwarded Message:

Subj: Nader meeting on Monday
Date: 6/26/2004 11:49:25 PM Central Daylight Time
From: Mantelhoffm
To: M Petrelis

Michael,
Just wondering whether you know about any Nader 2004 merchandise. Do you know if it's out yet. Also, did you say you're going to have petitions on Monday evening. Also, even though I know Michael Moore isn't supporting Ralph this year I thing if we get a bunch of people to head out to the movie theaters where Fahrenheit 9/11 is playing. We should be able to pick up a bunch of signatures. People will sign up after watching the film, I'm sure.
See you Monday,
ian hoffmann

^^^
[Please post and redistribute far and wide.]

Dear Friends:

I am gathering signatures to place Ralph Nader and Peter Camejo on the California ballot, and as you can imagine, it's not the easiest task trying get people to sign the petitions.

When the voter is willing to sign, and understands how important it is to offer voters a choice this November in the presidential race, I find we then talk for a few minutes about the Nader campaign.

As you may know, we need 153,805 valid signatures, to qualify for the ballot, therefore our goal is 210,000 signatures by August 6, 2004. There is much strategizing and work to do before then, and you can play a crucial part in gathering signatures.

To increase the number of signatures from San Francisco, I am taking the initiative to meet up with other Nader volunteers.

I'll be hosting a relaxed meeting from 6:00 to 7:00 PM on Monday, June 28, at the City Blend Cafe, located at 3087-16th Street, between Mission and Valencia streets. The closest BART station is the 16th and Mission stop, and Muni bus lines 26 Valencia, 22 Fillmore and the 14 Mission bring you to the cafe.

Stop by and pick up petitions and San Francisco voter registration forms. If you're already collecting signatures, come meet other Nader supporters and help organize more of Nader campaign in San Francisco, and the larger Bay Area.

Also remember there's a meetup.com sponsored San Francisco Nader supporters event on Thursday, July 8 at 7:00 PM, place to be determined. Visit meetup.com and vote for your favorite place to meet next month.

Can't make my June 28 meeting, but still want a petition or voter registration form from me?

You can call me at 415-621-6267, or email me at mpetrelis@aol.com, to make arrangements for me to get you the needed materials.


Best,
Michael Petrelis
HornFan
Worst of luck to your efforts for getting Nader on the ballot. A vote for Nader is just another vote for George W., so save yourself some time putting together petitions and just vote GOP.

rolleyes.gif
hockeyTom
I agree. Why don't the indies make as much noise, when its not a campaign year. It seems like the only time they are heard is when there is a Presidentail election year. Hmmmm. If you want Bush, vote for Nader.
Joe in Philly
You make a good point, puckman--all of the third-party groups ought to put some resources into building their party, and I think the way to do that is by winning some local races first. Once they have a viable base, then they can run nationally and really be an influence. Right now they're wasting their time and energy and money just to say "we had a Presidential candidate." Big deal!
DallasUNC
Why dont you help a better cause and get the Green candidate on the CA ballot? Nader can fend for himself.
fantomas
Nader appears to be tangling with some unsavory characters in Oregon, and now Bush-Cheney '04 has been drawn into the mess:

Salon: Joe Conason's Beat

QUOTE
June 29, 2004  |  A Washington watchdog group is charging that Ralph Nader's presidential campaign benefited from \"illegal\" assistance provided by right-wing organizations -- at the behest of his supposed opponents in the Bush-Cheney campaign.

According to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington -- whose name sounds as if Nader could once have been its founder -- the Nader presidential campaign received illicit assistance for its petition drive in Oregon last weekend from two local conservative organizations, which were \"encouraged\" by President Bush's campaign committee.

Melanie Sloan, CREW's executive director, plans to file a complaint on Tuesday with the Federal Election Commission, charging that Nader and his conservative enablers in Oregon violated the federal statute prohibiting corporate contributions to presidential candidates.

Accused in Sloan's complaint along with the Nader and Bush campaigns will be Citizens for a Sound Economy and the Oregon Family Council, whose leaders have acknowledged that they are trying to help the \"independent\" gadfly win a place on the state's November presidential ballot. The two conservative groups admit that they are backing President George W. Bush, and quite frankly describe Nader as nothing more than a convenient instrument to drain support from Democrat John Kerry in a closely fought battleground state.

In recent weeks, the Oregon conservative groups deployed their phone banks to contact Republican voters, urging them to attend a Nader rally in Portland on Saturday, where the candidate's organizers sought to gather enough signatures to place him on the ballot. Although only 1,000 valid signatures are needed, the Nader campaign had already tried once and failed last April, when only 750 voters showed up at a similar event. On Saturday, with CSE and OFC phoning and organizing their members to rally behind Nader, more than 1,150 voters turned out and signed the petition.

As Russ Walker of Citizens for a Sound Economy explained, \"We disagree with Ralph Nader's politics, but we'd love to see him make the ballot.\" Walker even posted a \"phone script\" on his group's Web site that offered activists talking points to convince their fellow conservatives to sign Nader petitions.

Mike White, director of the Oregon Family Council, which focuses on social issues such as abortion and gay rights, was equally candid: \"We aren't bashful about [aiding Nader]. We are a conservative, pro-family organization, and Bush is our guy on virtually every issue.\"

But Sloan said their telephone campaign -- and any other assistance provided by the right-wing outfits in Oregon -- was unlawful. \"Both of these groups are 501C4 corporations,\" she said, referring to the section of the federal tax code under which such political \"educational\" outfits are exempt from taxation. \"They are corporations, and therefore can't make donations. The phone calls are an in-kind corporate contribution prohibited by the Federal Election Commission.\"

Sloan has also included the Bush-Cheney campaign itself in her complaint. \"Apparently the Bush campaign encouraged these calls and may have even allowed some of them to have been made from Bush campaign headquarters,\" she told Salon. \"It is illegal to solicit a corporation for a campaign donation so Bush-Cheney, by soliciting CSE and OFC to make calls, would have been soliciting a prohibited in-kind corporate donation.\"

The alleged violations, Sloan added, resemble those charged to TRMPAC, the committee used by Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Texas, to funnel corporate contributions into Republican legislative races in his home state. A Texas grand jury is currently investigating whether DeLay and TRMPAC violated laws that outlaw corporate spending in the state's elections.
More on the site....
MPetrelis
After allowing my subscription to The Nation to expire, due to lack of funds last year, I renewed my subscription and now read it regularly.

The latest issue's back page ad is an artistic rendering of Dubya eating a headless child, drops of blood around his mouth and spilling onto his hands, and it's undoubtedly an eyeful of political art.

If you're a fellow subscriber to The Nation, then you know the ad I'm talking about in the July 5 issue.

But if you're not reading The Nation these days, and you want to see this powerful, and somewhat obscene, piece of public advertising art, go to the sponsoring organization's web site: http://www.pleasevote.com/.

You may soon see this work of art on other web sites, at antiwar rallies and on tee shirts.
jqueer
That's not a headless child. From pleasevote.com:

"The website www.pleasevote.com is a call to vote the Bush administration out of office. The sculptor Richard Serra contributed the illustration based on Goya's "Saturn Devouring one of his Children" that appears on the site's home page. The image will also appear on the back cover of The Nation magazine, issue date July 5, 2004."
hockeyTom
That is one scary picture. eek!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.