QUOTE
TomFord:
\"where the Attorney General is no longer named John Ashcroft.\" He should retire that line. If not, he's opening the Dems up to criticism that they're \"soft on terror.\"
Nah, it goes over well with anyone who's not a diehard Republican or a Christian Right fanatic. Recall that Ashcrap just said, while over in Europe, that defeating Saddam was good not because he was a horrible, murderous dictator, but because his weapons threatened to use "evil biology and evil chemistry." Oh yeah--let's keep this racist zealot in the AG office!
Anyways, Kerry isn't so bad. He's actually quite a fascinating character. So what if he scares lots of straight white men and gay men think he's ugly. A woman I know said he was sort of "Kennedyesque," and she didn't mean Teddy! He also has a more moderate record than Baby Teddy, but HAS been pro-gay rights, unlike Al Bore and many Democrats, and liberal on racial issues since he was IN HIGH SCHOOL.
Not only would his wife be the first immigrant first lady in a while--and the first born in Africa, and the first billionairess in his own right--but Kerry also, as I've said before, would be the first US president of Czech and Jewish ancestry, and the first in a while to be directly descended from people who arrived on the Mayflower (including one of the first governors of Massachusetts and of Connecticut). He's also a decorated war hero, Roman Catholic, a divorcé, a successful former prosecutor (who nailed the mob in Boston). It's a fascinating combo--he's so mixed he's about as American as we come.
All in all, I trust him more than Bush. I hope Edwards wins the nomination, but a combo of him and Kerry, or Edwards and Richardson, or Edwards and Clark, or Kerry and Clark, would all be preferable to Liar and Dracula.
PS Will the GOP start whining that anti-Kerry commentary in the South is anti-Catholic? Isn't this what they were claiming when they couldn't ram their judges through, even after spying on and stealing the Democrats' computer files?