George Twins fan
Jan 26 2003, 07:50 AM
To determine if you think the Super Bowl should be played in cold weather venues such as New York or Chicago. Feel free to discuss your reasons below.
[ January 26, 2003, 06:51 AM: Message edited by: George_vikingfan ]
theodoresdaddy
Jan 27 2003, 05:03 PM
How about letting the team with the best record host the game?
The Super Bowl has degenerated, as is the case with all pro sports and most of college football and men's basketball, into nothing more than a farce rather than celebrating the best two teams.
It's all to make money.
Denver Fan
Jan 27 2003, 05:17 PM
I would love to have the Super Bowl come to Denver. The elements make this game fun. I don't think you could use the team with the best record's home venue, only because the Super Bowl has to be prepared for, and a few weeks would leave fans with a lesser experience.
Besides, if the weather were colder, maybe "Lip-syncing" Slutty Shania might have covered herself, and that would benefit us all !!!
Joe in Philly
Jan 27 2003, 07:42 PM
QUOTE
theodoresdaddy:
How about letting the team with the best record host the game?
Because of the media crush (beyond any other sporting event, I assume) and the sponsorship and so on, the logistics involved make this impossible.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.