A few points.
Re: GLAF Conference.
It was my understanding that while the first conference was very successful, the second one was a bit less so because it was basically the same thing: same issues, same people. There was less excitement, and the attendance didn't increase. People felt: Why should I go to this conference when it's basically the same as the last. But, by making it a biannual event, the added time makes it more of an 'event,' there are more issues arising, more demand, more 'newbies,' and hopefully, bigger turnout. (It's like if you had the Gay Games every year it wouldn't be as big a draw as having it every 4 years.)
FC, you might consider joining the GLAF's
yahoo group and then you'll received updated postings from them. They also have regional 'committees" (Boston, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Orange County, Colorado, Salt Lake City, Dallas, Houston, Philadelphia, and Washington D.C) which you could join--or, you could start your own (I know I was asked if I wanted to develop a Toronto chapter; I declined due to lack of time). With your 'inside' perspective on college sports, obviously you could provide some insights that they would appreciate, and they may even want you as a panel speaker at their next year's conference.
scottie taught me a lesson: you can't just wait for somebody else to organize an event. Sometimes you just have to do it yourself.
So, FC, you already have a leadership role as a coach. You might consider making your suggestions known to the GLAF--or the NCAA. Another boardmember I know goes to the NCAA meetings (he's a prof at a college), and I believe he told me there was at least one 'session' on issues related to gays in sports.
There's another organization called the
GLAA (Gay & Lesbian Athletes Assn.) which you could join, too. They have a mentoring program where they try to match up gay athletes/coaches with mentors. And they can also provide resources and educational materials regarding gays & sports.
And, I believe the GayGames and OutGames will have some conferences and panel discussions in association with their events.
So, there's lots on the horizon.
QUOTE
shore:
I thought CANMARK was organizing a Canadian conference, and I thought he had no choice about it, we told him so last year. Or am I wrong about this?
Yes, I
have said that I would be interested in organizing a
future Outsports convention. Just not this year. Perhaps next year. (Yes, I know that sounds
Waiting for Godot-like, but surely there are others who would like to host the fine men (and women) of Outsports, and plan a fun and informative convention.)