I would think that as an interrogator he was already in a "non-combat" position, to the extent that such a thing can exist in a battle zone.
But the impression I get is that he had come to the conclusion that the "occupation" was causing the problem. Regardless of the role he took in that occupation he would have been supporting it. What other conclusion could be drawn from this
QUOTE
Sgt. Ricky Clousing went to war in Iraq because, he said, he believed he would simultaneously be serving his nation and serving God.
But after more than four months on the streets of Baghdad and Mosul interrogating Iraqis rounded up by American troops, Clousing said he began to believe that he was serving neither.
He said he saw American soldiers shoot and kill an unarmed Iraqi teenager, and rode in an Army Humvee that sideswiped Iraqi cars and shot an old man's sheep for fun — both incidents Clousing reported to superiors. He said his work as an interrogator led him to conclude that the occupation was creating a cycle of anti-American resentment and violence.
?