My question is, why is Obama blamed when the "mainstream" media bring up race? It's not his fault. Also, there's nothing wrong with bringing up race, which is central to American history and life, but why won't the media really address the real problem, which isn't race, but racism? Why won't Hillary Clinton, whose first election to the Senate from New York depended heavily upon black voters (who voted for her overwhelmingly, allowing her to rack up huge vote margins in Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Westchester County, Nassau, Buffalo, Albany, Troy, etc.), and whose husband would not have been president without black voters (he absolutely needed black voters to win states like Georgia, that were split between Perot and Bush I), have the decency to say to her supporters, look, racism is wrong, and if I don't get the nomination (which she won't), you should work through whatever racist feelings and fears you have, and vote for my fellow Democrat? Instead, she is propagating racism with her stances, which today included the outrageous analogy of her position to the opposition in Zimbabwe!
Yes, some racism factors into white voters not voting for Obama. Some white voters won't vote for him for other reasons. Some won't vote for him for those other reasons coupled with racism. Right now he is tied with Hillary among white voters in a number of states, and is ahead of her in almost every category of white voters in California, for example, except for older white women. But there areSo the issue is not "white" people or "white" voters per se, but certain voters in certain states who will not vote for him not the issue of politics or policies, but because of his perceived race (and let's not forget, the man's mother was white).
Far more problematic to me is this very dangerous and subterranean racist and anti-Semitic game some people--neocons, people affiliated with the right wing, etc.--are playing to keep promoting the idea that Obama is a Muslim. The newest version appears in The Christian Science Monitor. A few weeks ago a strangely similar, very sleazy op ed piece, which talked a lot about assassination, appeared in the New York Times. As a result, all sorts of right-wing sites and general news sites, blogs, etc. picked up these articles, and if you look at the comments sections, there are a number of people who're absolutely convinced that the arguments are factual and true. The Times did at least publish letters by Muslim scholars and Muslims themselves that debunked the very premise of Luttwak's, and now Burki(-Liebl?)'s commentaries. You cannot inherit being a Muslim. You must profess it and be aware of your profession. Obama's father left that faith before Obama was born, and Obama was not raised as a Muslim, nor has he ever avowed that faith. Yet these articles keep cropping up.
The logic appears to be that if they're repeated enough times, it will stick in people's heads. Where have we seen that operate (successfully) before?

