Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Obama's cabinet
Outsports Discussion Board > Outsports > Politics & Religion
canmark
President-elect Barak Obama continues to announce his diverse cabinet by selecting Japanese-American Gen. (Ret.) Erik Shinseki as Veterans Affairs secretary.
QUOTE
President-elect Barack Obama has chosen retired Gen. Eric K. Shinseki to be the next Veterans Affairs secretary, turning to a former Army chief of staff once vilified by the Bush administration for questioning its Iraq war strategy.

Obama will announce the selection of Shinseki, the first Army four-star general of Japanese-American ancestry, at a news conference Sunday in Chicago. He will be the first Asian-American to hold the post of Veterans Affairs secretary, adding to the growing diversity of Obama's Cabinet.
* * *
Shinseki's tenure as Army chief of staff from 1999 to 2003 was marked by constant tensions with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, which boiled over in 2003 when Shinseki testified to Congress that it might take several hundred thousand U.S. troops to control Iraq after the invasion.

Rumsfeld and his deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, belittled the estimate as "wildly off the mark" and the general was marginalized and later retired from the Army. But Shinseki's words proved prophetic after President George W. Bush in early 2007 announced a "surge" of additional troops to Iraq after miscalculating the numbers needed to stem sectarian violence.
* * *
In Obama's eight Cabinet announcements so far, white men are the minority with two nominations — Timothy Geithner at Treasury and Robert Gates at Defense. Three are women — Janet Napolitano at Homeland Security, Susan Rice as United Nations ambassador and Hillary Rodham Clinton at State. Eric Holder at the Justice Department is African American, while Bill Richardson at Commerce is Latino.


TRL
Yes, General Erik Shinseki, the "academe", who was squashed like a bug by Rumsfeld, when the General disagreed with Rummy's troop policy.
fantomas
I think Shinseki will be fine. And then there's potential pick. (Not a good sign, though, that he can't keep his mouth shut.) I don't know much about him beyond the fact that he's the Bronx Borough President, so perhaps people who're more familiar with him can chime in. He's quite easy on the eyes, I must say.
PennState4Ever
Almost everything that's wrong with VA needs to be addressed by Congress, as there is VERY little that a VA secretary can do to fix the problems in the system.
sportinlife
Obama seems to have shown good judgement in his choices so far. I am reminded though of a really darkly humorous editorial to the New York Times about Obama's election.

Can't remember whether the blogger was Indian or Arabic, but he was totally unimpressed with the fact that US voters would give the "worst job in the world to a black man" or something like that.

The same could be said of the entire cabinet considering the way things are being left by the previous administration.

And I repeat, they are not done yet.

I'll add that I find Stephen Chu as Secretary of Energy to be one of the more intriguing - and hopefully pleasing - picks that Obama has made for his cabinet. Maybe I am a bit biased as a scientist, but it will be nice to have someone in the next administration who thinks in the way most scientist think: humanely, though some find that hard to believe. And Chu looks like the epitome of that kind of thinking. Also, as mentioned in the second link, he's a serious departure from past Energy heads. I hope he is listened to more than the limited role of his office suggests. Obama is a pretty serious thinker himself, and maybe they will click on a personal level. Hope so.
sportinlife
Like the A-team from Alice in Wonderland this bunch just gets interestinger and interestinger. B-bama takes it to the hoop with this cabinet thing.

Point guard Arne "dunkin" Duncan at Secretary of State
IPB Image

He has four years of pro-ball experience in - wait for it - Tasmania and Melbourne

Not to mention camp drop-out props for the Keltics themselves.

With a little 3-on-3 with BHO bro-in-law Craig Robinson and an unnamed third, he "dominated" Chi-town street ball in the '90s.

Also hooping for the B-team Bama-bodyman and former Demon Reggie Love, select-NSA member and former Georgetown player The General Jim Jones, trash-talking big Apple high schooler (prob. a sub) and select-AG Eric Holder, "passionate" picker-upper now select-Treasury Sec. Timothy Geithner, and last-but-certainly-not-least select-ambassador to the UN and DC high school star Ms. mix-it-up Susan Rice. And holding down center of course, the big time 'bounder and sharp-shooting lefty Beeeeee-rack Hussein Oooobama.

IPB Image

He also gets to referee. rolleyes.gif

But can they score? Only the shot-clock knows for sure.
sportinlife
Three fathers take time off from the worlds problems to talk to inner city kids.

Nice photo op. Hope the actions will match it.
Bill W
It's mostly a business-as-usual Cabinet. Ho hum.
sportinlife
QUOTE(Bill W @ Dec 18 2008, 11:06 AM) *

It's mostly a business-as-usual Cabinet. Ho hum.
Maybe not. Dan Tarullo recently appointed to the Fed looks more like an academic than his other economics-related appointments. And folks there have a longer term (14 years) than cabinet officials even if that cabinet official were kept on with a presidents re-election - which gives them a little of the aspect of judges.

I would like to have seen academics at Treasury and the SEC as well. Both of them could see their current select-heads recycle back into the cesspool from which most "financial experts" come. With that prospect, it is difficult to see them having the vision to enact real reform.

We shall see soon enough.
fantomas
QUOTE(Bill W @ Dec 18 2008, 04:06 PM) *

It's mostly a business-as-usual Cabinet. Ho hum.


Do you feel this way about Congresswoman Hilda Solís, the new Secretary of Labor? She's a real progressive.
sportinlife
QUOTE(sportinlife @ Dec 19 2008, 10:24 PM) *
I would like to have seen academics at Treasury and the SEC as well. Both of them could see their current select-heads recycle back into the cesspool from which most "financial experts" come. With that prospect, it is difficult to see them having the vision to enact real reform.
Damn I hate having to quote myself, but I should also have mentioned that Obama has repeatedly made clear that the "vision thing" (as I think a former president called it rolleyes.gif ) is all his responsibility. I think he deserves an "A" in presidentialness for recognizing that one up front.
Bill W
fantomas, I agree that Solis might be a good pick. I'll be watching.
canmark
Washington Post: Richardson Withdraws Name as Commerce Secretary-Designee
QUOTE
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson has withdrawn from his name from consideration as commerce secretary for President-elect Barack Obama, citing an ongoing investigation about business dealings in his state.

Richardson, 61, who competed unsuccessfully for the Democratic presidential nomination, was secretary of energy and U.N. ambassador during Bill Clinton's presidency, and also the first high-profile Latino named to Obama's Cabinet.

But a grand jury in New Mexico is currently looking into charges of "pay-to-play" in the awarding of a state contract to a company that contributed to Richardson.
Crew Chief
QUOTE(fantomas @ Dec 20 2008, 10:51 PM) *


Do you feel this way about Congresswoman Hilda Solís, the new Secretary of Labor? She's a real progressive.


I'm against her for one reason, fantomas: her support of union card check legislation. Now, I know right-wingers don't like that issue because, well, we KNOW their stance toward unions. Well, even though union membership is very low in today's world compared to decades ago, I have been a member of the following unions in my lifetime: CWA, IBEW, Teamsters, SEIU (a rather large and powerful union, btw) the IFT/AFT (IL. Federation of Teachers/American Federation of Teachers), and now the IEA/NEA (IL. Education Assn./National Ed. Assn.).

If a workshop wishes to unionize, I'm all for the opportunity for the workers to vote their desires, whether for or against. To eliminate the secret ballot would expose those who oppose unionization and result in intimidation, harrassment, and more. I am completely and unequivocally opposed to anything that makes things more difficult for workers in their working environment, and this so-called employee free choice act, or whatever moniker it has, is BAD legislation designed to do one thing: further empower the union leadership, something I do not wish to happen.

What really irks me is that those congressmen and senators who support this are the first ones to retain their own secret ballots when it comes to committee assignments and the like. Typical do as we say and not as we do politicians.


QUOTE(canmark @ Jan 4 2009, 01:22 PM) *


So it IS true--Richardson is Blagojevich's long lost brother! I knew it!

Just who does New Mexico think they are, Illinois?!? The nerve of some people to think they can compete with OUR corruption.
swiminbuff
At least Richardson had the good grace to withdraw his nomination before an investigation could become a distraction for the new nomination. If the investigation clears him I hope a position can be found to allow him to serve.
sportinlife
QUOTE(Crew Chief @ Jan 4 2009, 03:46 PM) *
To eliminate the secret ballot would expose those who oppose unionization and result in intimidation, harrassment, and more.
I would normally consider a secret ballot better but apparently the current "secret ballot" has been exploited by employers to coerce workers through group "intimidation, harrassment, and more". And the card check system has been found to significantly reduced such abuses in one analysis in Britain and Canada:
QUOTE
Examining 118 organizing efforts, they found "strong evidence that card check agreements reduced management campaigning …use of illegal tactics such as discharges and promises of benefits, and also substantially increased the union recognition rate [as did] campaign time limits and requirements that employers provide unions with employee lists."
When an entity pays all the voters and can fire all of them, how can the vote be free? This editorial makes the case better than I can.
QUOTE(Crew Chief @ Jan 4 2009, 03:46 PM) *
So it IS true--Richardson is Blagojevich's long lost brother! I knew it!...Just who does New Mexico think they are, Illinois?!? The nerve of some people to think they can compete with OUR corruption.
My partner and I have disagreed about Richardson for some time. He thought Richardson would have been the best candidate for the Democrats for president. I was not particularly familiar with him but found him less articulate than the other candidates for the nomination. The Commerce Department is one of the three I consider most important in the restructuring of the economy. The SEC and the Fed are the others. Those nominees need to be above board in their financial dealings. Trust is what our economy lacks. People in these positions must be trusted.
Crew Chief
QUOTE(sportinlife @ Jan 4 2009, 09:27 PM) *
I would normally consider a secret ballot better but apparently the current "secret ballot" has been exploited by employers to coerce workers through group "intimidation, harrassment, and more". And the card check system has been found to significantly reduced such abuses in one analysis in Britain and Canada:When an entity pays all the voters and can fire all of them, how can the vote be free? This editorial makes the case better than I can.


Except that this isn't Canada or Britain. We're different from them when it comes to our workforce and all. I'm all for unions and everything, but I'm not in favor of this legislation that is under consideration.
sportinlife
QUOTE(Crew Chief @ Jan 4 2009, 10:36 PM) *

Except that this isn't Canada or Britain. We're different from them when it comes to our workforce and all.
How so? And is that a good thing?

Should our labor laws look more like Canada's, our largest trading partner, or China's our second largest trading partner?

Restricting workers rights can "work" for sure. But which would we rather resemble in terms of human rights?

For the current stimulus package to promote "buying American" would eventually help our trading partners who have better human rights records if that package included laws that gave preference to partners whose human rights laws are more similar to our own. Obama may need to trust his "liberal" instincts more.

And returning to Obama's cabinet, the current situation is becoming a serious concern. It would not be if it were clear that he were in charge and had a clear sense of the direction he wants to take the country.

But it now appears he is just trying to do the opposite of Bush. That's refreshing but insufficient for progress.
Bill W
QUOTE(sportinlife @ Feb 5 2009, 03:36 AM) *

But it now appears he is just trying to do the opposite of Bush. That's refreshing but insufficient for progress.


Really? Not nearly in enough areas. (see Gates, upcoming Afghanistan surge, scattered stimulus priorities)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.