QUOTE(forthemasses @ Mar 25 2009, 09:51 PM)

TG, it's quite embarrassing when your basis for Lady Brady being a better QB than Favre is SB rings facted with *s, age, looks, a "hot famous wife", and he can make good descisions.
Further, your basis for Favre being an indecisive drama-queen ego-maniac is because he decided not to retire last season. All in all Green Bay suffered and the NYJ had a decent season.
Okay, just so you and I are clear, your anger has nothing to do with football? You see three shiney SB rings and a Stetson ad and it automatically makes Lady Brady a great QB. I am sure the Patriots offense would like a little credit for protecting Lady Brady. Put Brady in any other offense and he would be just another average QB.
His looks and wife
aren't my basis, the three SB rings vs just one are. And it's the bitter fanboys of all other teams who try to claim they have an "*" attached to them...because they seem to forget that after this silly spygate happened (like all other teams don't do the same or something similar) they STILL won the next 16 of 17 games in that season. No wonder the ESPN commentators got sick of it and called it overblown so early on. You want a REAL "*"? Try Barry Bonds or Roger Clemens...THOSE guys deserve an asterisk.
And no, my distaste for Favre comes from his inability to retire, and stay retired. If you're going to call it quits, call it quits, don't put your fans (Green Bay) through what they had to go through. How could he NOT see all the turmoil he was causing the organization and the GB fans? If he saw all that, and actually understood it, and all the negative fallout from the drama, he would have just packed it in early on, and stay retired. But no, he just HAD to have the spotlight on him again.
Trying to credit the rest of the Patriot's offense for all of Brady's success is pretty laughable, but that seems to be your pattern, laughability. If that were true, they would have made the playoffs with Cassel, since according to your brilliant logic, it's only because of the rest of the offensive line that the Patriots have succeeded, not the talent of the quarterback himself.
If you want to believe an older, past-his-prime, quarterback with one SB ring, 7 seasons with 17 or more interceptions and with a lifetime QB rating of 85.4 .... is somehow better than a younger, still-in-his-prime, quarterback with 3 SB rings already, a lifetime QB rating of 92.9 (where the most interceptions he's thrown in a season is 14, as opposed to good ol' Brett, where the
fewest he's thrown is 13)...well you have fun with that belief. SB rings are from actual results and facts, unlike MVPs...which are awarded by some writers.
You asked the question, who's better than Favre today. I answered. Tom Brady. Like another poster said, Favre USED TO BE a great quarterback, he's past his prime now. And it's not just for now, in comparing both careers, Brady's still the better quarterback, but it won't really be fair to compare them until Brady's career is over as well. Hopefully when he retires, he'll learn from your hero, Favre, on how NOT to do it.