A long in-depth piece about Nadal.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/21/magazine...mp;ref=magazine
Full Version: Rafa in The New York Times
"Because he left early, before he and Federer could face each other, there will always be an unanswered question attached to Federer’s championship"
i stopped reading there. Screw her and her ignorant statements.
i stopped reading there. Screw her and her ignorant statements.
QUOTE(snicks @ Jun 18 2009, 01:44 PM) 
"Because he left early, before he and Federer could face each other, there will always be an unanswered question attached to Federer’s championship"
i stopped reading there. Screw her and her ignorant statements.
Agree. She didn't have to say that. He earned it on the square with the near escapes he had to conjure up against Acasuso, Haas and Del Potro
I wish I didn't agree so much with the opera metaphor.
Nadal is reminding me more and more of Callas.
It'd be interesting to talk with the journalist who wrote this. Lots of tennis journalists in the Bay Area.
Nadal is reminding me more and more of Callas.
It'd be interesting to talk with the journalist who wrote this. Lots of tennis journalists in the Bay Area.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.