We haven't discussed Roman on this site. I find it sick how some elite Hollywood types take up for Polanski. One actor stated that since Roman lost his mum in the Holocaust that we should give him some slack. I had relatives killed in the Holocaust. That doesn't excuse or absolve anyone of crimes. How stupid. Polanski was 45 when he raped a thirteen year old girl in a hottub. He f**ked her in her ass and performed other atrocities on a child. The girl was drugged on qualudes and booze. She begged him to stop. He is legendary for his over 10 inch penis. Just think how he tore that poor child up anally. he's a sadistic perv. I hope he rots in prison if the USA ever gets him brought back. What do others in the outsports community think?

He will probably only spend 6 months in jail if he is brought back to America. But better that than no punishment.

The fact that you say he's legendary for his penis size says a lot. About you.

Polanski should just man up and face the music. He already pleaded guilty so just be done with it already.

I do agree that some elitist in Hollywood is looking over the fact that he had sex with an underage girl who said NO at the time. Despite the fact that she's forgiven him now as an adult, the behavior when she was underaged is atrocious! A brilliant director doesn't mean he can be forgiven as a sex offender.

I was only reporting what the French and other continintal European press has been harping on. And I meant that his endowment would have injured a young child. I wasn't glorifying his endowment. Its been about two years since JOE IN PHILLY has attacked me on here. I have never said anything to be badmouthed by someone on an anonymous board. READ THE FRANCO PRESS AND YOU WILL SEE THE DETAILS OF MR. POLANSKI. Men with big members hurt children when they molest them. Just as any child is not made to be penetrated by any male.

Sadly child abuse goes across all class and economic stratagems. Polanski is a millionaire but the same sort of thing happens to children in Appalaccia and all over.

In Polanski's case I should have said infamous not legendary. Thank you.

I find it shocking how Sharon Tate's family come to Polanski's defence. Her sister has worked to keep Manson and the other killers of her sister in prison yet she defends a sexual abuser of kids.

It is my impression that Polanski got a lot of leeway for this crime for two big reasons - drugs and Sharon Tate. IIRC, Polanski was messed up after his wife's gruesome murder and of course this later crime occurred during the go-go 70s when most of Hollywood was high most of the time. Neither excuses him, but does explain some of Hollywood's reluctance to hang him high. It is also important to note that there has been no pattern of crime afterwards. Polanski is not a continuing threat, as far as we know, so that may account for some of the calls for leniency as well.

What I find interesting is the moralizing about Polanski in light of the crimes we don't seem to care about pursuing. For instance, how many LA-area priests were involved in child rape? And how many LA-area (not to mention all those others nationwide) pastors, Bishops, Archbishops and Cardinals were involved in the resulting decades-long cover-up? That criminal conspiracy resulted in these allegedly religious men aiding and abetting rape after the fact, defrauding parishioners to whom they sent these monsters (where they would have even more unsuspecting victims) and obstructing justice through witness intimidation and hush money payouts to victims. Why, I wonder, do we not see the same outrage and demands for Bernard Law to be extradited from the Vatican to stand trial for his role in these types of crimes?

For that matter, how has Kobe Bryant - who admitted to sort-of being a rapist - gotten away with almost no public outrage at his actions? He never admitted actually raping the woman, but stated something along the lines of "I can see how she thought it was rape." WTF?

There are too many other examples to list. What bothers me is the selective outrage.

Pretty sure grown men of any endowment hurt small children when penetraing them, especially anally. Reporting his alleged/rumored/legendary cock size seems to be irrelevant and it's only purpose would seem to be an attempt at being salacious and controversial. The victim has now forgiven him and moved on.