Some of you guys probably have heard of Thierry Pepin. He's very sexy. I saw him in "Danny In The Sky". The movie was ok and he does a full frontal nude scene, no quick flash either, nice long shot of it flopping away as he's walking towards the camera. He's also been a model for Ralph Lauren.
http://www.dannyinthesky.com/fra/images/ph...nny/danny04.jpg
[Post modified to comply with photo policy. - Outsports moderator]
[ May 01, 2005, 08:07 PM: Message edited by: m1 ]
Full Version: Thierry Pepin
Lovin' those pouty lips and curly hair. I could do a lot with that!
He's just plain HOT!
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0000E3I...SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
http://nysocialdiary.com/socialdiary/2005/...es/P1030190.jpg
some very good pics
[Post modified to comply with photo policy. - Outsports moderator]
[ May 01, 2005, 08:08 PM: Message edited by: m1 ]
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0000E3I...SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
http://nysocialdiary.com/socialdiary/2005/...es/P1030190.jpg
some very good pics
[Post modified to comply with photo policy. - Outsports moderator]
[ May 01, 2005, 08:08 PM: Message edited by: m1 ]
A review from IMDB:
QUOTE
Nudity cannot make up for everything that's wrong with this film., 16 July 2003
Author: Ryan Kelly (thatdog99@aol.com) from Philadelphia, PA
I had the distinct displeasure of seeing this film at the Philadelphia Gay & Lesbian Film Festival. I could write a novel about all of the things that were wrong with this film, but instead I will break it down into just a few parts:
a) The cast - Sure, the himbos were nice to look at, but unfortunately any skin baring did little to ease the trauma of the terrible performances that were unfolding before my very eyes.
The script - I doubt if the writer(s) of this film had ever taken a Screenwriting class. The movie is filled with wooden dialogue, inplausible set-ups and not one of the characters has even one shred of likability (they're all pretty much wastes of human beings, except for Danny's dead model mother who we know nothing about, except she did drugs). I don't mind having unlikable characters in films, but if you're going to make us hate everyone at least do it in a film where something interesting happens.
I also believe the director is to blame. What made him think that people would want to watch a trainwreck/disaster like this? Just because you have some attractive men taking off their clothes-it doesn't mean that will sustain an audience's attention for 90 min.
AVOID THIS MOVIE AT ALL COSTS!!!!!!
IMDB link
Author: Ryan Kelly (thatdog99@aol.com) from Philadelphia, PA
I had the distinct displeasure of seeing this film at the Philadelphia Gay & Lesbian Film Festival. I could write a novel about all of the things that were wrong with this film, but instead I will break it down into just a few parts:
a) The cast - Sure, the himbos were nice to look at, but unfortunately any skin baring did little to ease the trauma of the terrible performances that were unfolding before my very eyes.
The script - I doubt if the writer(s) of this film had ever taken a Screenwriting class. The movie is filled with wooden dialogue, inplausible set-ups and not one of the characters has even one shred of likability (they're all pretty much wastes of human beings, except for Danny's dead model mother who we know nothing about, except she did drugs). I don't mind having unlikable characters in films, but if you're going to make us hate everyone at least do it in a film where something interesting happens.I also believe the director is to blame. What made him think that people would want to watch a trainwreck/disaster like this? Just because you have some attractive men taking off their clothes-it doesn't mean that will sustain an audience's attention for 90 min.
AVOID THIS MOVIE AT ALL COSTS!!!!!!
Bobby,
This movie was ok, the lips not moving to the words was weird but better than having to read subtitles. This post was not about the movie being great, it was about Thierry Pepin.
But now for your point. I have seen many gay themed films and most of them blow! (no pun intended)None of the guys are great thespians. The only really great one that I can even remember off of the top of my head is "The Trip". Larry Sullivan was great. He though is a true actor that has worked at his craft. There have been some other good ones, but always with real actors with a quality script. Most of the gay films that are released are not worth the price of admission. Many of the cast are not trained actors and don't want to be, they just want their fifteen minutes of fame within the community. So if you can find the eye candy and enjoy it, then it's worth the admission price. If you're going for great film, then you will be disappointed most of the time.
It's not about budgets either. Many independent films are made on a shoestring, but they have quality scripts, dedicated staffs that will work sometimes for nothing, and actors that are driven to become working actors. Gay films repeat the same themes over and over and usually poorly.
This movie wasn't great, but seeing the eye candy made it worth sitting through.
[ April 11, 2005, 07:51 PM: Message edited by: TommyC84 ]
This movie was ok, the lips not moving to the words was weird but better than having to read subtitles. This post was not about the movie being great, it was about Thierry Pepin.
But now for your point. I have seen many gay themed films and most of them blow! (no pun intended)None of the guys are great thespians. The only really great one that I can even remember off of the top of my head is "The Trip". Larry Sullivan was great. He though is a true actor that has worked at his craft. There have been some other good ones, but always with real actors with a quality script. Most of the gay films that are released are not worth the price of admission. Many of the cast are not trained actors and don't want to be, they just want their fifteen minutes of fame within the community. So if you can find the eye candy and enjoy it, then it's worth the admission price. If you're going for great film, then you will be disappointed most of the time.
It's not about budgets either. Many independent films are made on a shoestring, but they have quality scripts, dedicated staffs that will work sometimes for nothing, and actors that are driven to become working actors. Gay films repeat the same themes over and over and usually poorly.
This movie wasn't great, but seeing the eye candy made it worth sitting through.
[ April 11, 2005, 07:51 PM: Message edited by: TommyC84 ]
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.