Greetings, Tom Brooks; your message about the nutritional aspect of bodybuilding is absolutely welcome on this thread. (If I hadn't been so lazy when I first started this topic I could have searched-out a previously-posted subject-heading relating to the sport of bodybuilding in
general, within "OTHER SPORTS", rather than beginning an entirely
new thread here...)
I'm far from being a bodybuilder myself (actually I more closely resemble the typical 98-pound weakling-type) but for a long time I have been impressed with the
combination of disciplines necessary for success in bodybuilding, including nutrition. Since I've spent about 20 years working in the "natural foods" sector I've also acquired an enduring interest in diet as a component in achieving and maintaining fitness goals. I'm certainly not a nutritional expert, either, but I'll be glad to e-mail you information about books and internet resources available in New Zealand that may help you attain some of the results you're seeking.
One of the features I found fascinating in the SANDOW website above was the perspective on early bodybuilders who modeled their own proportions after Greco-Roman examples, so that renowned statues from Classical Antiquity were carefully measured to determine ideal size-ratios between all body parts. An exact mathematical formula was discovered for computing these ratios precisely, and the SANDOW website provides a built-in calculator for demonstrating these measurements, based on wrist-size. Also included on this same webpage is a photo of an ancient Italian statue that was admired for its perfection in this regard.
CLASSICAL PROPORTIONS FOR THE IDEAL MALE PHYSIQUESeveral early bodybuilders made a point of developing the oblique (side) muscles in the waist, because the historical paradigm they valued most had been derived from ancient statuary that was
not narrow-waisted.
GEORGE HACKENSCHMIDT was an exemplar of the massively-muscled waist. Today's highly-tapered torso was actually considered "weak-looking" a century ago (and throughout previous eras that found inspiration in the Greco-Roman world.)
I've also learned how descriptive a couple of terms from early physical-culture actually were, when they were coined many years ago. A few early bodybuilders prided themselves on their ability to deftly isolate and subtly move each individual muscle on their frame, in rapid, wave-like sequence: hence the term "rippling" muscles; this was considered one of the skills unique to the artistry of bodybuilding. And "dumbbells" were truly dumb (silent) bells: heavy cast-metal bells that had had their clappers removed so they could be used as weight-training devices.
[ March 02, 2003, 02:56 AM: Message edited by: fielderschoice ]