Posted by
Munson Man (Member # 569) on October 31, 2005, 03:44 PM:
Wow, that is a shocker! Manny wants to be traded (again), Theo walks, Damon opts for free agency - does ANYONE want to play for the Team from New England??!!
Posted by
canmark (Member # 149) on October 31, 2005, 04:19 PM:
Epstein is only 31 years old, walks away from his dream job, and... what's next?
QUOTE
A next step for Epstein, 31, remains unknown, although he has told associates that he may leave baseball and look for another line of work. The Dodgers, Phillies and Devil Rays currently have GM vacancies but it is believed that Epstein is likely to take a year off from baseball before considering a return.
Posted by
Joe in Philly (Member # 6) on October 31, 2005, 04:41 PM:
He's kind of young to be needing a break from baseball. On the other hand, I'm not sure anyone can top breaking an 86-year curse at the age of 31. Maybe he's already washed up.
Posted by
Adam (Member # 75) on October 31, 2005, 05:20 PM:
From what I had understood, the Red Sox met all Epstein's requests/demands, so what went wrong? Were internal relations that bad? LA sportstalk says Theo may go work with his brother as a social worker for a bit.
And, with Epstein leaving and Manny (being Manny) asking for a trade, re-signing Damon becomes more important, if for no other reason than public relations. Johnny should be able to back up the Brinks truck.
~Adam
Posted by
Munson Man (Member # 569) on October 31, 2005, 06:08 PM:
According to what I read online, Boston offered Theo triple the salary - $1.5 million per year. However, he was adamant about getting $2.5 million annually, which was what the team offered Billy Beane a couple of years ago.
Posted by
fenwayguy (Member # 14) on October 31, 2005, 06:37 PM:
Epstein's
statement. Boston Globe
breaking story (still showing a sidebar link to this morning's \"Epstein, Red Sox agree on a three-year contract\").
Some on the
Sons of Sam Horn discussion board posit that a strained relationship between Epstein and Red Sox president Larry Lucchino played a significant role in his decision, and that yesterday's
Dirty Laundry story by Globe sportswriter Dan Shaughnessy, and last week's press leak about the ongoing Manny Ramirez negotiation, may have brought things to a head. Lucchino is suspected of having been the source.
QUOTE
I'm convinced [Shaughnessy's] column (with LL's fingerprints all over it) threw Theo for a loop.
QUOTE
Theo HAD to read that (the column) and just say, \"how the eff can I work for a guy who would put this nonsense out there? This is disingenous, calculating, malignant, and manipulative... and I'm not gonna stand for it anymore.\"
So: KUDOS TO THEO. THIS IS THE MOST PRINCIPLED STAND I'VE SEEN IN SPORTS--OR IN BUSINESS--FOR A LONG TIME.
I'm disappointed, shocked--and damned proud of Theo all at the same time.
Strangely, while it makes me anxious about the near-term fate of my Sox, I find it reassuring that there are young men of high ideals like Theo.
My favorite SoSH smartass post so far: \"The next GM of the Red Sox will be a target like no other. I already want him fired.\"
Edited to add:
Commentary from Boston Herald sports blogger Michael Silverman, which Canmark linked above: \"Epstein had done some agonizing soul-searching the past few days, torn between staying at the job he had always coveted since his childhood days in Brookline and leaving because of intra-organizational politics and power struggles that he ultimately decided he could not live with any longer.\"
Posted by
Joe in Philly (Member # 6) on October 31, 2005, 10:17 PM:
This part of the \"Dirty Laundry\" column doesn't seem to ring true:
QUOTE
When Theo's assistant Josh Byrnes (hired by Arizona as GM Friday) made a deal with Colorado, Epstein thought he had a better deal with another club and requested that Lucchino fall on the sword and invoke the ownership approval clause to kill the Rockies deal. Accustomed to people hating him, Lucchino took the fall, killing the deal and saving Epstein.
Wasn't Theo the boss? Why wouldn't he have just said to Colorado \"there's no deal unless I approve it, he's only an assistant and I'm the GM, so there's no deal\"?
And if Theo can't handle in-office politics, well, I have no idea where he can ever find a politics-free workplace -- inside or outside of sports.
Posted by
Jamesy (Member # 3774) on November 01, 2005, 03:42 AM:
Great point Joe! The grass isn't always greener but at 31 and has achieved what he has already he can grow his own grass.
Posted by
Bill W (Member # 90) on November 01, 2005, 06:23 AM:
I would expect the in-office politics are less onerous in at least 25 of the MLB team offices than they are in Boston.
Hurrah for a guy who implemented true
smartball (albeit with a big payroll) with a team that had been badly run for so long. The nuts and bolts of how the 2004 Bosox were built are detailed in Baseball Prospectus' splendid new book
Mind Game, which should be on your winter reading list.
Posted by
batboy (Member # 773) on November 01, 2005, 09:09 AM:
I think Theo Epstein can write his ticket to any baseball position. But which GM jobs are still opened? Is the Dodgers still looking? I bet he would be a front-runner for that.
Keep in mind that Epstein is \"the new generation\" of managers, so maybe he just didn't want to put up with all the in-house office politics of the older generation?
Posted by
Adam (Member # 75) on November 01, 2005, 09:15 AM:
The Dodgers' GM post is still open but Paul Depodesta--just fired--and Theo Epstein are cut from the same cloth (young, never played the game, believers in \"Moneyball\") and the McCourts (and their closet advisor, the homphobic Tommy Lasorda) are more than likely looking in other directions.
~Adam
Posted by
Bill W (Member # 90) on November 01, 2005, 09:33 AM:
Christina Kahrl on
BP today nails it:
QUOTE
In case you've missed the events of the last 72 hours, counterrevolution is the fashion, and as our own Will Carroll has put it, the weapon of choice is the White Sox. Skip however smug and frequently fact-free interpretations of why the White Sox won are--maybe it's just me, but \"pitching, defense and the three-run home run\" was Earl Weaver's formula, not Gene Mauch's. However much Ozzieball is a put-up job, it's manna from heaven for the industry's old guard, a generation of men grown jealous in recent years over the credit heaped upon the game's up-and-coming wave of general managers.
However unnecessary the \"rivalry\" between old-school baseball and the next generation of management techniques could and should have been, that struggle has taken on a life of its own. In this sort of contest, the scorecard is not one that counts whether DePo and Theo were both General Managers of teams in the postseason in 2004, or one that records that Epstein's Red Sox did something that Gorman's or Duquette's did not. Success is apparently not the measure of success, it is instead what the now-unfashionable smart kids were damned well supposed to deliver, and the moment that they didn't, they were there to be scapegoated...
In Larry Lucchino, we have a man who long ago cultivated the legend that he's somehow solely responsible for Camden Yards, and devil take those who remember otherwise. Especially those who might recall his stated desire from the time, which was to tear down the warehouse that today is the signature feature of Baltimore's ballpark. Such a man is jealous of his place in history, coveting the past and the present as comfortably as he feigns disinterest in taking up Czar Bud's scepter the day after the car salesman steps down. In his need to portray himself as the father of victory, he has instead become like Cronus, so jealous of his prerogatives that he would rather consume the future than truly shepherd it. He came to Boston with a reputation for self-promotion, and this latest incident makes it plain that in Lucchino's world, he's the star of his own show.
[ November 02, 2005, 06:06 AM: Message edited by: m1 ]