QUOTE
Joe in Philly:
I would say that the league has creatively interpreted Sura's play as a ball that he lost control of and then recovered himself, and therefore not a shot, so there can be no rebound. And if it puts a stop to this crap, I'm all for it.
Hi Joe. It seems that the NBA is saying that since the shot was not a (real) attempt for a field goal, that there was no shot, hence, no rebound. I'm guessing though, that if a Net rebounded the "shot" instead, he would have been credited for the rebound. Also, there are also times when a player will intentially miss a free throw at the end of the game. I wonder if the NBA also disallows rebounds in that case as well, or if they make a difference between trying to set a record or trying to win a game through contrived means. But the NBA (and NCAA) seem to be okay with the ridiculous number of contrived fouls near the end of a close game to give your team a chance to win. I'm not trying to be too argumentative here, but just bringing up some other related points.
I agree that Bob Sura should have had the tenth rebound taken away as well. But I like the way he handled the situation afterwards with class. I would also like other athletes that have attained records through contrived (or illegal and/or unfair) means to also come clean.
[ April 13, 2004, 11:01 PM: Message edited by: pat125 ]