1. It's the Community Of Money they respond to. Some have a longer-term view of this than others, i.e. to promote their diversity is better for their bottom-[political]-line long-run than not, besides the actual $$ involved. And at a certain point--where would they draw the line in terms of groups to allow/promote and those they wouldn't?
With more and more teams reaching out/dependant on the local community to "pitch in" to the tune of million$ to subsidize their stadiums and luxury boxes, a broad base of support is important. So what stops them from doing more active solicitation of gay groups is the presumed belief that they would offend more than they would gain. So they sit on their hands. Especially if they already sell out [NFL] or have a fan base that is perceived as being--shall we say--less tolerant.
When politicians, who are elected to represent all of us, take the lead in repressing some of us--can we really expect those that are motivated solely by profit to be more progressive?
2. It does gnaw at me that no team has an openly gay player, and that the leagues do nothing to prepare for the eventuality. There's more time spent on planning for Hall Of Fame busts of bygones than there is on the very real face of bigotry in their leagues.
There is now a nearly standard-issue PR response to RockerComments. So a press release is put out, the offending athlete tiptoes out on the plank to read a half-apology, and everyone talks about moving on. Rinse, repeat.
3. This whole site is about being a gay sports fan. But as for identifying at a sporting even, I'm very reluctant to do that. Danger seems to pervade such events, with alcohol fueled-machismo hanging thick in the air. With athletic events so often based on Proving Something, it's not a stretch to imagine fans--not to mention players--wanting to make sure they did if you identified yourself as gay.
Although I understand the desire--I don't buy the argument that there is no such thing as a gay or straight fan. Yeah--we're all god's children...let's get in a circle and sing Kum-Ba-Ya! Guys are constantly talking about women when they're at sporting events: how hot the cheerleaders are, the occasional hot girl in the vicinity, who they left at home, who they work with...it's nearly endless. And yet we--the gay fans--are supposed to say nothing like that, lest we reveal our differences??!
To me that says that we're 2nd class fans: our seats, while bought at the same price, are in fact worth less. We have less freedom to be ourselves, and that pisses me off.
There are always going to be exceptions: season ticket holders, who get to know each other, and come to accept the gay fan. But generally, I think sporting events are scary places to be an out gay man, and I wish that wasn't so.
4. Growing up in Michigan, I was a Lions fan. I'd go to the neighbors and watch them grind out the ground game, but I have to admit that looking back on it I thought their uniforms were pretty cool! I then moved on to the Orange-Crush Broncos, despite their usual demise in the playoffs, going to far as to make a special Orange Crush punch for their Super Bowl appearance.
As a kid, I saw the Vikings play the Broncos at a Mile-High preseason game when visiting Denver. I use the term "saw" loosely, because the combination of being high up in the cheap seats, with waves of smoke wafting up from below watered my eyes to the point where it was hard to tell the Purple from the Orange!
Lately, partly due to living in LA, and partly because I'm a gay--it's more about following individual players than it is teams. With players changing teams as often as they do their proverbial underwear

, it doesn't tend to engender much loyalty. So I pick the players I like, and follow them [thanks to the Sunday Ticket on the dish] anywhere they go. Especially if it's the diligent clipboard holder, pacing the sideline next to the coach!
[ May 04, 2005, 07:19 AM: Message edited by: Brent ]