Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Gay HOF Baseball Player? / Sandy Koufax Rumors
Outsports Discussion Board > Outsports > Gays in Sports
Pages: 1, 2
mindboggle
An excerpt from Richard Johnson's, NY Post Page Six Column insinuates about a closeted Hall of Fame baseball player. Anyone here about this especially given the recent surge of this subject in baseball?

QUOTE
WHICH Hall of Fame baseball hero cooperated with a best-selling biography only because the author promised to keep it secret that he is gay? The author kept her word, but big mouths at the publishing house can't keep from flapping
[Thread title updated for clarity and timeliness. - Outsports moderator]

[ February 21, 2003, 11:10 AM: Message edited by: m1 ]
DC_guy
How many hall of fame player have biographies that are best sellers and written by women? I doubt it's all that many.
The only one I can find is a biography about Joe DiMaggio.

[ December 19, 2002: Message edited by: DC_guy ]

dupontred
On another message board, the consensus was that it is Sandy Koufax. Apparently the author has gone on record talking about the long struggle it took to get the book written, which is unusual, talking about it, that it.

http://www.juf.org/news_public_affairs/art...le.asp?key=3625

http://www.bookmagazine.com/issue24/biography.shtml
Charlie in the Trees
[quote]Originally posted by DC_guy:
The only one I can find is a biography about Joe DiMaggio.


Hey. Just because a guy has an obsession about Marilyn Monroe doesn't mean he's gay.
DC_guy
[quote]Originally posted by Charlie in the Trees:


Hey. Just because a guy has an obsession about Marilyn Monroe doesn't mean he's gay.



I know, I just looked for a guy with a biography by a woman.
RGMike
That NY Post "Page Six" column is the same one that started the Piazza flap, without mentioning him by name either.

Since the Koufax bio was just recently published, odds are that's who he's referencing.
bryan d.
I was recently told by a friend in a LA that a sports writer told him that Johnnie Bench is gay. Of course, I don't know if that's true or not but my friend (who's str8) wouldn't mention it unless he believed it. who knows...
Adam
When Jane Levy, the author of the recent Sandy Koufax biography, was interviewed by Dan patrick on his radio program, she was asked whether Koufax was difficult to write about because he's so "secretive" (Dan Patrick's term.) Her reply was that it was not hard & that Koufax is private, not secretive, and that though the book is unauthorized, Koufax was quite cooperative and offered psoitive comments upon reading it.

~Adam
dwb56
Johnny Bench!? My very first athlete crush, and before I'd figured out what a crush was. Sigh... If only...
scottie
Aren't we assuming it's a biography that's already been published? It would be interesting to find out what books are in the pipeline, due to be published in the next 6 months or so.
Joe in Philly
The item called it a best-seller, which indicates it's already released, not in the pipeline.
TC
Interesting thing about Bench: when he was getting a divorce, his wife claimed he brought his best friend on their honeymoon. Hmmm...
billybob
Also, if memory serves, Johnny Bench never remarried after his divorce. Also what is or was the marital status of Sandy Koufax? Not that it makes any difference, but just interesting. I have a feeling it has to do with Johnny Bench.
gamecock
[quote]Originally posted by billybob:
Also what is or was the marital status of Sandy Koufax? Not that it makes any difference, but just interesting.


In answer to your query BillyBob, Koufax is twice divorced and has been single now for over a decade, if I'm not mistaken....I'm fairly certain that the not so subtle references are to none other than the Dodger Hall of Famer who Jane Leavy chronicled in her recent biography -- I, for one, was shocked that the notoriously shy and private Koufax (who has apparently moved around the country MANY times following his retirement in an effort to avoid the fame and publicity that his notoriety brings) granted Leavy the "open door" to write the book....personally (and I admit this may sound somewhat selfish from the standpoint of benefitting our "community") I wish Koufax would come out (if the rumors are true) because it would be incredibly difficult and harsh for ANYONE to be critical of an athlete who not only achieved the enormous greatness that Sandy did throughout his short but illustrious career but, more importantly, has always conducted himself with tremendous class on and off the field for over 40 years.

[ January 02, 2003: Message edited by: gamecock ]

sooner
there have always been rumors about johnny bench. it would make sense.
libaseballjock2
I went to school in Cincinnati and there were many people who confirmed these rumors.
fantomas
Other than the top-selling Koufax biography, which is great, have any other biographies of ballplayers written by women come out recently?
copman
[quote]Originally posted by libaseballjock2:
I went to school in Cincinnati and there were many people who confirmed these rumors.

About Jonnie Bench or Sandy Koufax??
billybob
Where is Jonny Bench now? Living a "private life"
below radar? Have not heard much on him in recent years.Would be interesting to know, just out of curiosity.
Somehow this all reminds me of years ago, before Dave Kopay came out, he would hang out at P Street Beach in DC. It is where all the gays would go to sun themselves in various stages of dress and near undress. In fact I often talked to him. No big deal. Is Johnny or sany ever seen in public with or without "someone"?
Jim at Outsports
The rumor was about Sandy Koufax. He is boycotting the Dodgers because of it.
gamecock
That's extremely sad and unfortunate for all the Dodger fans, Jim, not to mention their young pitchers who could have benefitted immensely from Koufax' vast knowledge of the game....after 48 YEARS of loyal service to the franchise (going back to their days in Brooklyn), for Sandy to be backstabbed by one of Rupert Murdoch's own "evil media empire" is indeed contemptible.

As I stated previously, I have always admired Koufax not so much for his obvious prowess on the mound (which I was much too young to have enjoyed) but for the classy way that he has consistently conducted himself following his premature retirement....any retired ballplayer, particularly one of his Hall of Fame stature, deserves to be treated much better than this.
Jim at Outsports
Here is what the author of the book, Jane Leavey, said about Koufax:

“Sandy Koufax is as principled a human being as I have ever met in my life. If this is a stand he is taking, I certainly understand why he might feel that way and I totally support it.”
Sport_13
Johnny Bench...hmmmm...I have heard rumors about his sexuality as well, but I see him as someone who is more asexual than anything else. He's still revered here as some sort of icon, and will always be...has many local endorsements. I recently attended a benefit for the Life Center here in Cincinnati. They educate people about what needs to be done in order to be sure that in the event of thier passing thier organs are donated.(http://www.lifecnt.org/homepage.html) JB was one of the former local athletes that participated in this event (Anthony Munoz, Ted Pwer, Dave Parker also attended)...to make a long story short. JB is a total a**hole...my friend who works for the Life Center had a sister pass away a few years ago and donated her organs to help others. She had a photo of her sister, who was a HUGE Reds fan and thought it would be a nice gift to enlarge the pic & have it signed by one of her sister's favorite Reds players, and give it to her parents as a gift. Anyhow, she approached him, introduced herself, and was beginning to explain what happened...he cut her off, told her that there's no need to be nice to him...people aren't nice to him unless they want something...then he looked at her & said "What do you want to have signed?" She then produced the pic of her sister & explained that her sister was the reason she belives in and works for the organization. She thanked him for his "support"...made him feel like sh*t, and then he tried to act like he was all interested in her story. She thanked him for his time, and signature, and walked away. I have no respect fom him after witnessing that whole ordeal. I've always been someone who gives everyone the benefit of the doubt when it comes to questioning someone's chatacter...I still do. I had always hear about what a jerk he is, but in JB's case... maybe I should have listened to my friends and peers. He's just another Great player who turned out to be a jerk.
m1
In another thread, redsoxbreath posted:

Ok, let me get this (ahem) straight... According to an L.A. Times report this morning,
  • HOFer Sandy Koufax' biography was published last fall.
  • On Dec 19, a gossip item the NY Post reported that a \"Hall of Fame baseball hero\" had \"cooperated with a best-selling biography only because the author promised to keep it secret that he is gay.\" (Not clear what \"cooperated\" means here. Did she blackmail him to let her publish his biography?)
  • News Corp owns both the Post and the L.A. Dodgers.
  • To protest the Post, Koufax has severed all ties to the Dodgers.
  • Everybody has flown into a tizzy.
The book's author, Jane Leavy, calls the Post item "blatantly unfair, scandalous and contemptible. I certainly understand why he might feel that way and I totally support (the stand he is taking)." Tommy Lasorda says, "This just ruined my day." Dodgers manager Jim Tracy: "I have a tremendous amount of respect for (Koufax)." Shawn Green: "This is really a shame." Eric Karros: "This is upsetting."

It may be worth noting that Koufax has done all his communicating through "friend Derrick Hall, a Dodger senior vice president," and has refused to face the press. The Times refers to him as "intensely private" and "very private." Geez, I guess so. What's the big freakin' deal?


DC_guy replied:

Whether or not he's gay, he's definitely proving that he's a little bit stupid. How is making a huge scene like this going to make the situation go away. I think a lot of us spent enough time in the closet, and have known enough closeted people, to know that freaking out at the rumor that you're gay is the best way to confirm it (for me anyway).

I didn't need to hear about his celebrity look-alike female friend. next thing you know he'll be on the MTV awards kissing Lisa Marie.


Charlie in the Trees replied:

I know people in the media generally are using this as an "any port in a storm" excuse to bash Rupert Murdoch, but ...

(1) Are people (like Koufax?) seriously believing that Murdoch pre-clears the Page Six gossip items, so that anything published there must reflect the opinion of Rupert himself? If anything, this seems to indicate a surprising amount of independent among the various tentacles of the Murdoch global empiure.

(2) I understand that a heterosexual guy wouldn't want to be rumored to gay. (I mean, how many gay men constantly complain about being assumed to be heterosexual?) BUT ... I'd have liked a little less vehemence, and a little less anger, from the people "defending" Koufax's "honor." The author, in particular, is absolutely seething about the rumor. "Scandalous," yes, but "contemptible"? Y'know, it's not that bad to be gay.


William1865 replied:

Don't these guys have public relations advisors? Do they think everybody in America reads the NY Post, and more specifically Page Six in the NY Post? I can guarantee you the answer is no. So by bringing this up and making a big deal of it, Koufax and Co. are simply introducing lots of people to a controversy they would otherwise have known nothing about. Same with Piazza and his "I'm not gay" press conference. I'd guess most people had never heard of the Neal Travis blind item, and plenty of those who had would not have even bothered to put two and two together and get Piazza. But by addressing the gossip, he gave it legitimacy. Plus, saying "I'm not gay" sounds very defensive, thus there is at least a little bit of doubt built into the statement from the very start. Just my 2 cents worth.
fenwayguy
Interesting to read the article that Dupontred links to above, which focuses on Koufax' Jewish heritage, and how it impacted his career. "His staunch resolve in the face of anti-Semitism is typical of the portrayal of Koufax that comes through in the book -- as a man of quiet dignity and modesty. In the biography, (author Jane) Leavy refuses to discuss much of Koufax's personal life, including his two failed marriages. 'There's a certain level of dignity that he comported himself with, and I thought it behooved me' to uphold his privacy, she says."

BTW, Koufax is 67 (12/30/35), Bench 55 (12/7/47).

[ February 21, 2003, 09:29 AM: Message edited by: redsoxbreath ]
canmark
Whether he's gay or straight it doesn't really look good to break "off ties after 48 years (with the Dodgers organization) in response to a two-sentence item than ran in the New York tabloid on Dec. 19."

The poor man. If he IS gay, I hope he knows that there are so many of us (gay & straight) that would support him and be so proud of who he is. If he IS straight, then his response seems to have gone overboard.

Jim, Cyd... see if you can't sign him up as guest speaker at next year's convention. Hurry before the vultures (Barbara Walters, Geraldo, Oprah, Dateline, 60 Minutes, Larry King, Martin Bashir, etc) beat you to the punch! wink biggrin.gif

Sandy... we're with you man! smile.gif
Jim Allen
Sport13's post reminds me of why I have no need to meet people who's work in music/sports/art etc. I admire. I don't WANT to know what they are like as a person--I just want to stand 5 feet from Jim Thome and see if he has "It", the thing that makes me go weak kneed at the thought of having sex with him.

On topic, one of my favorite books ever is Martin Grief's Gay Book of Days. Simple idea: for each day of the year, a person either known or thought to be gay is profiled. In the section at the end of each month is a list of intials and their professions. Whatever month Sandy Koufax was born in, there's "SK - Baseball player". This was in 1982/83? so it's not as if this is a new thing, the gay rumor.

And what W1865 said.
Cyd at Outsports
When we here at Outsports print stories about a person or organization, one of the things we always watch for is if people say that what we said is not true. Often, people will hoot and holler and get mad but, at the end of the day, the report is true.

Funny that no one, so far, has said that this report isn't true - though, they're certainly jumping up and down about it.

[ February 21, 2003, 09:41 AM: Message edited by: Cyd at Outsports ]
dupontred
okay...can I get some props for being the first to peg this rumor way back when it was first posted?

seriously, I think the man made a huge mistake. I mean, why call attention to the rumor? If he is gay and doesn't wish to come out, that is.
FeverDog
Until today, I didn't even know this thread existed.

I've been making my way through Ken Burns' "Baseball" series, and earlier this week I watched the chapter on the '50s. When I first saw Koufax (he was little more than a name to me before), the possibility that he was gay did cross my mind.

Now all this. If nothing else, this "scandal" has once again validated the sharpness of my gaydar. (Not that I'm giving credence to Page 6, though.)

[Props to Dupontred for being the first to peg this rumor way back when it was first posted!] biggrin.gif

Now, I hope the last chapter (#9, which I'm renting this weekend), profiles Bench.
m1
In another thread, UCLAjono posted:

For those that have read/heard the news that Koufax has sever ties with the Dodgers because NewCorp printed a two sentence piece in December that is he is gay, I would like to say a couple things.
I think that he is handling it well. Of course the way he is handling it also makes me think that he is gay. By not outright denying it, it feels that he is saying it is true. Yet, he is a very private person, and that is why I think he is really doing this. If he is indeed gay, this is obviously something that he didn't feel was anyone's business but his own. And I support his decision. It is nice to see that all those who have been quoted (from what I have seen) have not included one anti-gay remark. And that is something that seems to be rare in sports.
Also, if he is gay, and does decide to let the world know, I do think that paves even more ground for a sports figure to come out. I personally would really like to see this happen at some point. It would be nice to see a man shatter stereotypes.
Joe in Philly
QUOTE
Jim Allen:
On topic, one of my favorite books ever is Martin Grief's Gay Book of Days. Simple idea: for each day of the year, a person either known or thought to be gay is profiled. In the section at the end of each month is a list of intials and their professions. Whatever month Sandy Koufax was born in, there's \"SK - Baseball player\". This was in 1982/83? so it's not as if this is a new thing, the gay rumor.
Interesting--I remember picking up this book in the bookstore many many years ago and leafing through its pages and finding this exact reference. When I would see an article about Koufax and how he guards his privacy, I always flashed back to that book.
George Twins fan
I watched PTI and Around the Horn yesterday to see what the reaction was with these reporters for more reputable papers. ATH addressed the issue more as a "Will We Say a Gay Male Team Athlete in Our Lifetime" and only one of the panelists, Woody Paige thought we would. The others were pretty adamant that we would not, citing the lack of support for Esara Tualo when he came out. Sadly I think they are right. The panelists said all the right things like "its nobody's business", "we've had gays before". But nobody offered any kind of solution.

PTI addressed it more by attacking the lack of journalistic integrity the NY Post has. But neither seemed encouraging that a gay male team sport athlete could/would come out.
Jim at Outsports
I was quoted in today's LA Times about it.

If the link doesn't work, here is what I said:

Jim Buzinski, publisher of the gay sports Web site outsports.com, said he has mixed feelings about the outrage over the Post item.

"It sort of has an implication that if you're named as being gay, it's somehow this terrible slur and accusation," said Buzinski, also an editor for the Times' foreign desk. "While I'm not defending some wrong thing in the New York Post, someone like [radio host] Lee Hamilton called it 'character assassination.'

"Assuming someone's gay, that's assassinating their character? That always kind of bothers me, that the gay thing gets twisted around, as if the worst thing you can accuse a person of is being gay.

"Koufax is obviously a man of great integrity and he did what he felt he had to do, but I'm sort of troubled by some of the reaction of people saying, well, go get 'em.... Something about it strikes me as [strange], that even in the sports world the whole thing of being labeled as being gay is considered so scurrilous that you have to go and do something like Koufax did, which was sever ties with the team that he's been a legend with."
jayp
I agree with Jim that the tone of all the comments suggests the Dodgers think being gay is a terrible character flaw.

Still, if you read closely, all the comments seem very carefully worded, in a Clintonesqe way, with no outright anti-gay hate speech. I think this is because they're aware - correctly - that making overtly homophobic comments is playing with fire. They wouldn't have hesitated to say "gay is disgusting," etc. as little as 15 or 20 years ago. Only the author of the book came close, by using the word "contemptible" in a way that could have referred to the press questioning her "journalistic ethics" and not to the rumor itself.

Also conspicuously absent from all the coverage is this - there hasn't been a trace of an outright denial that he's gay. None from Koufax or, more revealingly, from any of his associates, past or present, only carefully-worded comments about embarassment, etc. Again, not long ago you would probably have had quotes about how, e.g., "I've known him for [umpteen] years and he's totally straight." They all seem annoyed only that it was mentioned at all . . . hmm, food for thought.
RJK3
I also found Tommy Lasorda's comments in the LA Times today very disturbing: "I'm happy they admitted the mistake because this was totally unfair for Sandy to have to deal with. Whenever something is written about you in the press and you know it's not true, you want to see them get it right." First off, Koufax hasn't denied he's gay, rather he's taken the position that's he's a very private person. Didn't Tommy's son die of AIDS? Is he still that homophobic?
jayp
Again, even Lasorda, homophobic as he is, is using careful wording. I don't think it's the unedited Lasorda talking. He could have made a much uglier gay-baiting blast, but my guess is that the Dodgers PR department may have restrained him to avoid a fiasco with LA's large gay fan base. So, he meekly refers to the gay rumor merely as "something written about [Koufax] in the press" that's not true, as if they had published a mistake about his ERA or win/loss stats. Still not a denial . . .
Munson Man
As a prior poster noted, I haven't seen any statements from anyone who seems close to Koufax stating unequivocally that the rumor is false. The comments seem more along the lines of safeguarding his privacy, and of anger at the line which separates the professional from the personal being crossed. I have no idea whether Koufax is gay or not, I just hope he finds some peace of mind - It seems that someone who could allow something like this to bother him so much is probably torturing himself in many ways for many things.

PS - For what it's worth, the NY Post has officially retracted the story in today's editions.
canmark
That such a mountain is being made of such a molehill... just sounds like a case of the lady doth protest too much.

As Jim says (great quote Jim--you rock!), if someone calls you gay... is that such a horrible thing?

It's not like the paper said he was a racist, a murderer or a child molester. The mere suggestion that he's gay by a paper in NY is enough for Koufax to penalize the LA Dodger organization, its players and fans in so drastic a way? This is all very unfortunate.
Adam
from Munson Man:

I just hope he finds some peace of mind--It seems that someone who could allow something like this to bother him so much is probably torturing himself in many ways.

Perhaps, but perhaps Sandy Koufax is a highly moral, principled individual who does not gossip or spread rumors about others and does not tolerate rumors or gossip about himself, either. Thus he would not be tortured in any way & was merely acting on his own deeply-held principles in severing his ties with the News Corp. division with which he was involved.

I agree it would be heartening to have a world-class, team-sport athlete come out of the closet but I am opposed to a person being dragged out by a gossip columnist. To say that Sandy Koufax brought more atention to this by his actions miss an important point: he severed his ties with the Dodgers in a private letter to the organization. The Dodgers made it public setting off the "firestorm." Since retiring from the game, Koufax has never sought out the spotlight & wouldn't have in this instance--it was forced on him.

~Adam

[ February 22, 2003, 04:39 PM: Message edited by: Adam ]
fenwayguy
So Koufax' point in going public was to get a retraction and apology from the NY Post. He must have understood that a furor would ensue, so he's standing on some principal or other, for sure.
Joe in Philly
But Koufax didn't go public. The Dodgers (and others) did.
fenwayguy
Ok, that's the part I didn't get. :confused: Thanks, Joe. Koufax expected the Dodgers to say "No comment" when his absence was noticed by fans and the press.

[ February 22, 2003, 10:08 PM: Message edited by: redsoxbreath ]
jayp
Whether the Dodgers or Koufax actually contacted the media first is probably irrelevant. He had been a fixture of their organization for 40 years (spring training, Chavez, etc). A big media blitz would have ensued anyway the day the Dodgers had to explain why he was nowhere to be seen anymore . . .

Unfortunately for Koufax, he's a legend, and there's not much he can do about it except avoid anything topic that is remotely controversial, which is how he's preserved his privacy all these years. If he doesn't, the media spotlight will find him whether he seeks it or not. He already decided to publish that memoir, which alone is enough to thrust him into the public eye. After almost 40 years, he can't just write a goodbye letter to the Dodgers and expect it to stay below radar, and it's disingenuous of him to expect otherwise.
fenwayguy
Thank you, Jayp. <slaps forehead> That's why I figured Koufax' whole point was to get the Post's retraction and apology. Maybe both are true.

Anyway, the Post's statement: "A two-sentence blind item we ran here on Dec. 19 about a 'Hall of Fame baseball hero' has sparked a series of unfortunate consequences for which we are very sorry. ... The author has denied making any deal with Koufax and called our item 'erroneous.' We apologize to both Koufax and Leavy for getting it wrong."

About the deal.
Jim at Outsports
I wrote a column on how the media coverage reinforced stereotypes of being gay in sport.
George Twins fan
Phil Taylor from CNNSI.com chimes in with an intersting take on the subject.

Good to see some mainstream press taking Koufax to task a bit with his silly overreaction. Here's the most interesting part of the article:

QUOTE
Why exactly was he so irate over the blurb, which had passed largely unnoticed for two months until his reaction brought it to the public's attention? Is it because he's an intensely private man who was offended by a newspaper trying to delve into his personal life? Or did he take particular offense at the intimation that he's gay?

If the latter is the case, that is certainly his right. But Koufax's reaction only reinforces the stigma attached to homosexuality, especially in sports. We can only wonder if he would he have been as incensed if the Post had called him an alcoholic or a tax evader or a shoplifter.

Being called gay remains the most damning label in sports. Items like the Post's hint at that truth, and reactions -- or overreactions -- like the one from Koufax drive the point home. The moment that athletes begin to treat rumors of homosexuality with less outrage is the moment that papers like the Post will stop printing them.

Obviously, there are gay professional athletes. If any of them were considering coming out of the closet, it's easy to imagine those thoughts disappearing when they see how desperately other athletes and ex-athletes strive to make sure they aren't stuck with that tag. When the athlete in question is someone like Koufax, widely considered to be one of the classiest and most principled sports figures of all time, it can only have an even more chilling effect.

The view here is that Koufax would have been better served to ignore the item and let Leavy refute it, if it had to be refuted at all. If he has been diminished in all this, it was not because of the Post's item, it was because of his own reaction.
ballplayer3
I agree with Adam.. It is all well and good for us to say how Koufax should have responded to the mention in the Post. But we should respect and honor his choice on how to respond. If he is gay, then let him so so and not to be outed by some blurb in a newspaper. Is it not a more powerful a statement if he does so on his own? After the Deric Peterson fiasco you would hope the community would realize that coming out is a personal choice. After all no one on this board as far as I know is a Hall of Famer baseball player like Sandy Koufax. We should honor both his privacy and his silence on his sexuality.Just because he does not share this community's view on outing does not mean his decision is wrong.
danimal
QUOTE
Jim at Outsports:
I wrote a column on how the media coverage reinforced stereotypes of being gay in sport.
Excellent column, by the way ... and excellent point by Phil Taylor of CNNSI about the chilling effect on athletes (and others, I might add) already afraid to come out. The stigma hurts everybody, and this whole freakin' flap just adds to it.

[ February 24, 2003, 04:56 PM: Message edited by: danimal ]
fenwayguy
Jim, you mentioned Salon, whose sportswriter King Kaufman has a take very similar to yours.

"Almost every one of those thousand newspaper stories expressed outrage at the Post for its sleazy journalism, and if you skim down each of them you invariably get to a passage that says something like, 'Whether Sandy Koufax is gay or not isn't the issue... What the Post did was wrong!' And yet I can't help thinking that it matters very much whether Sandy Koufax is gay. Forgive me for not quite believing that journalistic integrity is more important to the American public than whether or not a major sports figure is gay... Being called gay isn't the same as being accused of a crime."
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.