clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Tiger Woods' statement and transgressions

New, 15 comments

I talked to my sister today about Tiger Woods. If you have read Outsports for the full 10 years we've been around, you may remember that she's dabbled with pro athletes more than once. She told me all the talk about Woods is ridiculous. "Of course he cheats. Ninety-five percent of pro athletes cheat." It's a sad statistic, but it's probably true. Rich, often attractive (or at least fit) men flying around from city to city, away from their wives for long spans, start looking elsewhere.

I've never been one to say that because someone fits a statistic it makes it "OK." But I'm certainly not going to judge Woods for his "transgressions." If he cheated on his wife, he'll have to deal with her and his family. It doesn't change Tiger Woods the golfer in my eyes: I'll still be planning my spring and summer Sundays around whether he's in the hunt or not. He didn't call me a faggot. He didn't kill someone. He didn't get caught taking performance-enhancing drugs. So he gets a pass on this one from me. Though I'm sure his wife has other thoughts.

What did bug me, though, was part of his statement today. In fact, it was the majority of his statement.

But for me, the virtue of privacy is one that must be protected in matters that are intimate and within one's own family. Personal sins should not require press releases and problems within a family shouldn't have to mean public confessions.

Sorry Tiger, but no. You lost your claims to privacy when you won the Masters in 1997 by a million strokes. And even if you didn't lose it then, you did when you signed your countless endorsement deals. And even if you didn't lose it then, you did when you got into your car at 2:30 in the morning and smashed it into a tree. These were decisions you made. You know how our culture works. You know how the law works. And you have chosen to give up your claims to privacy. You certainly don't mind when you're strolling the sidelines of a Colts game and a camera's in your face. So don't try to play the victim here. You're not.

BTW, I wonder if the National Organization for Marriage is going to be protesting Woods at his next tournament...